X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=optonline.net;
	s=dkim-001; t=1603711188;
	bh=9yR37vfydhSQIQs5eFjXVe2mLBXvVXJ0IrrW9c+Vi/I=;
	h=From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To;
	b=ShwYFIPFeV43OCLSaYtGWhKP97gZJjPEif4Li2Cw9feIpv4+6doR3mnxS0TDRtn6y
	 RPwSy57GmHzlKkbvnsMbat14pzB6MMKgnjAGfof4P59jMz6WpABZq9bFHDHt0wM2h5
	 6OX54BQe4lzgPZ48h/qy+0ELog8W0naai1CjOwS1MQOuaN+po4hW6smStG62iQfEMQ
	 EBm20XzP1iz4JUkBJsQ9EELqWE2IVxj4H8JL13N3hDefpvj2ozGatqPNRw+jjjKEe0
	 vaE7kFsR+qireJic3GwRY7aQLdGcrCsWcBkEi+WuUqGmyon/KQSAoQ+KtNNonlG6t1
	 dlMbThPL4LCdg==
Authentication-Results:  mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net smtp.user=geneglick; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Authentication-Results:  mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net x-tls.subject="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google LLC/CN=smtp.gmail.com"; auth=pass (cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256)
X-Content-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=b4wpHuOx c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=3IhzcBOM8TGjKXwecDa7zg==:117 a=afefHYAZSVUA:10 a=2gdyHNNneyvb_YXZZf4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=zI3T66i89X7uUZxmR8sA:9 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=xoEH_sTeL_Rfw54TyV31:22
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532AHz/V/ctnIVZJTF3Sxevkm3xjky9HLxkbpQiG36VG87atOzmS
	MpeWfnqnJ+tVd61mqVATQxjULP4cp+BviaCAraU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgQ0Tm/FWmbDabPkURyxAeA+gii6UCwDdMcOFKTKQaGXtSa4ScLaj/As4lhWPbivCvxp2DXL0PFd7u+GdNd/A=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2a4e:: with SMTP id q75mr18115555ybq.427.1603711183212;
 Mon, 26 Oct 2020 04:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5ba24d79-87b2-c783-2bb9-a562d8dc4d73 AT linetec DOT nl>
 <xnh7qhkh8k DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAGBFkM0CE9udTcd2Lr7sbDLdZf0SytOW5+pfH8_uTpMZs9kg8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <ca12d5d7-7466-c001-899f-b6b98e25ae14 AT linetec DOT nl>
In-Reply-To: <ca12d5d7-7466-c001-899f-b6b98e25ae14@linetec.nl>
From: "gene glick (geneglick AT optonline DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 07:21:42 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAGBFkM0-TExDwdu6yRuwkr=g=0w_QRpzmkyiA1SgUPx9NF7aHw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID: <CAGBFkM0-TExDwdu6yRuwkr=g=0w_QRpzmkyiA1SgUPx9NF7aHw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB, 2 parts physically in the same place
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065d59405b2911bb3"
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--00000000000065d59405b2911bb3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Richard,
Yes, that makes sense. Once overlaying the parts, it won't allow setting
the thermals - so your approach of setting the thermals first, and then
overlapping the parts surely should work.

I sort of think the DRC warning is because the holes for the header and the
display are not 100% the same size. One of the parts drill size is 0.045
while the other is 0.040. Both have annulus of 0.015

--00000000000065d59405b2911bb3
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Richard,</div><div>Yes, that makes sense. Once overla=
ying the parts, it won&#39;t allow setting the thermals - so your approach =
of setting the thermals first, and then overlapping the parts surely should=
 work.</div><div><br></div><div>I sort of think the DRC warning is because =
the holes for the header and the display are not 100% the same size. One of=
 the parts drill size is 0.045 while the other is 0.040. Both have annulus =
of 0.015<br></div></div>

--00000000000065d59405b2911bb3--