X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: karl AT aspodata DOT se To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] fam.h In-reply-to: References: <20191129180210 DOT 507F38038A58 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to "Nick Bowler (nbowler AT draconx DOT ca) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Fri, 29 Nov 2019 14:09:39 -0500." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20191129201630.6D94A8038A5B@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 21:16:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Nick: > On 2019-11-29, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: ... > > why does it complain about missing fam.h ? > > Unfortunately it looks like the --without-libfam option in geda-gaf 1.10.0 > doesn't work quite right as the stubs till use the enum FAMCodes type and > the fam.h header is included unconditionally in order to get this type. > > Using 'int' instead should avoid the need for this header so I applied the > attached patch to avoid this problem. Alternately a stub type could be > defined when FAM is disabled. Ok, your patch makes geda compile, thanks. Regards, /Karl Hammar