X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on sirius.notyet
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Message-ID: <1552937004.5521.12.camel@ksys.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Anybody use gschem to draw flowcharts?
From: Buzz <buzz AT ksys DOT co DOT nz>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 08:23:24 +1300
In-Reply-To: <CAOh3dDboEoQDEhg2F8=t4xSJ4Wmc+pPqWRpTMm3E0uTZyL0fcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	<CAOh3dDbnUzwd4NiF9WyNbEJJq9v7uXC4PX+dTZ0EM6_Q0s-TPQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	 <CAGde_xNx4cZrS_-w2s-5gDiNNzABccmeZc67kGHWbyBjS_uHAw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	 <20190316182409 DOT 41886ca1 AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
	 <9f3fa69a-4ea4-fcaf-d285-7852b327b5a2 AT fastmail DOT com>
	 <20190316193156 DOT B65EB85E7F6C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	 <e4accaeb-2a4a-9e44-518c-a79e912c5578 AT fastmail DOT com>
	 <CAGde_xN8QsrCyzdB8EhMuaDZw-Vo19dcNS8V4=_vAdyW+zHL6A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	 <CAOh3dDaYSY29ad4P+kw8jHk5NkybyN+6PBT5oDyjJXcjiF7DBg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	 <CAOh3dDboEoQDEhg2F8=t4xSJ4Wmc+pPqWRpTMm3E0uTZyL0fcw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x2IJNU9O019277
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 15:01 -0400, Alan Corey (alan01346 AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Maybe I'll go back to my original idea of using gschem after trying
> Xfig for flow charts a little.  Xfig doesn't have attachment points,
> when you draw a line between 2 objects it's hard to get it exactly on
> the edge of each.  Gschem works better, but I'm not sure you can
> enter
> text in symbols with it.  Maybe I should write a flowchart program
> based on Gschem, keep the features I like, add what's missing.
I've used DIA for this type of thing before, it's not bad.

-- 
Cheers

Buzz