X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Message-Id: <201903081446.x28EkCsJ009448@delorie.com>
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crcomp.net;
	 s=dkim; h=Sender:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Message-ID:Cc:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:
	Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:
	In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
	List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=J3dvKkS/HQP0rHI2cRYObktqu0Up/6HVRSvtldxkMCg=; b=rPq/fdbFVDwL3KUI8vMYosXDtE
	4xXyrn4qHYL0K2j6dhayzmExRKg+Eqqab63HsN5rnEHWDbsQUA4t7f77AW3auLE10Bi2pNARsbGr5
	4wA8CVhuEyHBETagaQGxaL6ACnxwXL8TwnjYyyzbCTUl1pybaTGe7ASZl+BFduHG029bRJy24Zo6S
	G1WN/MeEqwJ2jSkVJCUcdQNr3oBptx54r6VRsgKpYHqaofrDzrgFw8Pfv9a7/o002UlduW1mX9CRg
	sjLz7VDhY7lkuf2WYOx8Ts+n5V+ODQYBPAfQMVBdplEa6lKsFOo7d3RKYm35x4CcrYgtzlgFH+3SZ
	k5VMms3A==;
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=OY7oNlbY c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=9MP9vxlQrmnoeofDS6o88g==:117 a=cYePNoeIYIZvZZmSUxP4wQ==:17
 a=NTGMnVQrEZIA:10 a=GlmxEaRcyfsA:10 a=nV01CTgfawgxh-N2BXQA:9
Date: 08 Mar 2019 14:46:08 UTC
From: "(mail AT crcomp DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: [geda-user] Is FreeRotateBuffer implemented in gschem?
X-EN-UserInfo: de154d50cc16294658ed7b7577430c21:931c98230c6409dcc37fa7e93b490c27
X-EN-AuthUser: mail AT crcomp DOT net
Sender:  <mail AT crcomp DOT net>
X-EN-OrigIP: 72.175.2.211
X-EN-OrigHost: host-72-175-2-211.ljn-co.client.bresnan.net
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Greetings,

gschem displays the dump shown below in its Status window after the 
FreeRotateBuffer(45) macro is Evaluated. Does this mean that 
FreeRotateBuffer is not implemented?


Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 160: 17 [catch #t #<catch-closure 8009e53c0> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 16 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 8009e53c0>]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 160: 15 [catch #t #<catch-closure 80d0ff240> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 14 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 80d0ff240>]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 387: 13 [eval # #]
 387: 12 [eval # #]
In unknown file:
   ?: 11 [eval-string-protected "FreeRotateBuffer(45)"]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 160: 10 [catch #t #<catch-closure 80d0ff060> ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 9 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 80d0ff060>]
   ?: 8 [eval-string "FreeRotateBuffer(45)" #<undefined>]
   ?: 7 [call-with-input-string "FreeRotateBuffer(45)" ...]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
2412: 6 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 80d1181e0 at ice-9/eval-string.scm:65:9 ()>]
In ice-9/eval-string.scm:
  44: 5 [read-and-eval #<input: string 80d03d9c0> #:lang ...]
  37: 4 [lp FreeRotateBuffer]
In ice-9/eval.scm:
 393: 3 [eval #<memoized FreeRotateBuffer> ()]
In unknown file:
   ?: 2 [memoize-variable-access! # #]
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
 105: 1 [#<procedure 80d18b780 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:100:6 (thrown-k . args)> unbound-variable ...]
In unknown file:
   ?: 0 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 80d0ff020> unbound-variable ...]

ERROR: In procedure apply-smob/1:
ERROR: Unbound variable: FreeRotateBuffer
#f

Thank you, 73,

-- 
Don Kuenz KB7RPU
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.