X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:25:12 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Lutz To: "Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] graphical not overriding netlister In-Reply-To: <60e8d7b3-2cd3-5610-c1f9-340250db3a13@fastmail.com> Message-ID: References: <60e8d7b3-2cd3-5610-c1f9-340250db3a13 AT fastmail DOT com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I am not sure what or where I can get the "master" branch. The process of building gEDA/gaf from the repository is explained here: http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:gaf_building_git_version In short, if you are using Debian, the following commands should do the trick: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get build-dep geda git clone git://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf.git cd geda-gaf ./autogen.sh ./configure --prefix=$HOME/geda make make install > For some years, I have been lobbying for a new gEDA release, but got > resistance that gEDA is now perfect and does not need any new > development or new releases. On the contrary, gEDA is far from perfect. For a long time, the problem was that the repository contained several unfinished features which no-one volunteered to finish. I'm currently working on cleaning things up, removing some parts, finishing other parts myself, so we can have a working release again. Maybe I'm setting the goal too high here, I don't know. Since most of the critical problems are solved now, I think I'll be able to roll a new release soon(-ish). > Since there were only four of these terminals giving me problems, my > solution was to re-draw the symbols as a real graphic without any > intelligence, leaving the net node electrically hanging. The net still > has a pull-up resistor connected to it, so it has more than one node. That sounds like a good workaround, but what were you trying to do in the first place? Roland