X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=89WtokyqLAuKSxDhpUUqofb4AoCXXZgkvVBoanNGjd0=;
        b=qDzvJi6C5TkLdNBCWlIXwES/KahaOvehax5OP/j3CuZf0dXUtdRZxvfGkuw3JMLeSJ
         aFWyZMJcmRL9xZKY49uTPul29+z5MUG8PgM25+BgKlIXYzhVlfrsAJ3MJAppJJmv5aBb
         G2q1KuqKhAPRELArPu5RsmAeR0nVxSzbu3ztUVfxDhAY3VHpPdiOnHwEsZIIitkFP8dC
         9/k5l8lc75O5uPnceGfN6p0H/NWiBC5TLtfzmE2s///jM3EMLyTBFpFhkOzYyJMB3vPH
         OXz1TlIRYus8S5wehdemXItUw/n6n1Hv6di8RTAtHa8arK8p4dK8wmpp5lym0Uqw3/Gk
         /sww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=89WtokyqLAuKSxDhpUUqofb4AoCXXZgkvVBoanNGjd0=;
        b=q8s6rUz6j/liR5Ic9DPiR9omp8CgkQKhn5f8PIn/HkK53fIb9TLJJcCge6ebwbLvnz
         5IsEYnQgvi1pUUEFqZBSPylB0T1aHGG+Hu0WFcdNJDtLgkRsrSPNBQ3Q9fe/KTQQ9O/z
         alTJ/L6EMnFEopeGEgtLL9sANJl4gOiDW9k1z15qDVW2k2urG29RQkZSSzBkxx6qCrsC
         REQAWj9i/eMrhZPVLEsKj2dewHbgw1PiayAjhzT/xK3B7LhmUjx2mfZ0RsZXCotzbg/4
         1hWxy614eqvkdCY+8nEbY4TqXtWGyLFx4r5zbpkm4Pk9ISjEaroTe8fGqYnfz6ccO0/v
         3qLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYQBFF/sLNBYzas5EMEyFlYYcMmHVuO74o8//NiZD6b7d2SiHhk
	1/c/3zipScQBjqsQ60hMqiimNfK7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZ9Qfhq3zKRM8pWwC+GNLSuhrT+HELXk2bFozl2+QTyUgQMnRk/7AoyQa6v/8IhlxgF1ug9Ww==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:91c8:: with SMTP id u8mr2840435ljg.185.1551120432889;
        Mon, 25 Feb 2019 10:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:47:08 +0300
From: "(graahnul DOT grom AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] graphical not overriding netlister
Message-ID: <20190225214708.03144b08@demon>
In-Reply-To: <d732710d-761f-1cef-ba17-c0383c82bca1@fastmail.com>
References: <d732710d-761f-1cef-ba17-c0383c82bca1 AT fastmail DOT com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:04:56 -0800
"Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Greetings,
> 
> I am using gschem 1.8.2 and pcb 4.1.3 under Slackware
> Linux.
> 
> I have a few terminal symbols in my schematic for show
> only. These terminals are on switches and are not
> connected to my PCB design, but other terminals on those
> switches are connected to the PCB. I am using the same
> terminal symbol for other signals on the PCB and they do
> not give any errors. I thought that in order to keep pcb
> from complaining, I can set "graphical=1" in all of the
> show-only terminals and that would make those terminals
> "invisible" to the tools. It seems that of those
> "graphical=1" terminals, PCB is complaining that it
> "Can't find Enn pin 1 called for in netlist", (where "nn"
> is the terminal refdes number). If I delete these
> offending terminals, then pcb stops complaining and gives
> the "Congratulations" message.
> 
> It was my understanding that if "graphical=1" is used in
> an instantiated symbol, that the tools will ignore that
> symbol. Apparently, from my observation that is not quite
> true. Is there another way to disable a symbol so that
> the tools ignore it, or what am I doing wrong with my use
> of "graphical"?
> 
> Note that I am using gsch2pcb to get the netlist for pcb.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Girvin Herr
> 
> 

Hi Girvin,
I cannot reproduce this with gschem 1.8.2 and pcb 4.1.3.
graphical=1 attribute works as intended: gnetlist ignores
symbols with that attribute set. Could you please provide
us with some sample schematic to test with?

regards,
Dmitry.