X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 173.48.170.224 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com From: John Doty Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8A115DDF-158E-4C95-97DC-79903BE54CD0" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Refdes bug or Master Attribute Document on the Wiki needs update. Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 12:51:41 -0500 References: <9ed059c0-f3c5-1482-169b-f8f1119f3208 AT fastmail DOT com> <5BC4365D-FBD0-4495-806B-C30BA710D31B AT noqsi DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <4739A346-6DB4-4250-965C-13AA19863969@noqsi.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_8A115DDF-158E-4C95-97DC-79903BE54CD0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On Jan 30, 2019, at 12:23 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: >=20 > So please don't confuse the level of cooperation pcb-rnd gets from = your=20 > favorite tool with pcb-rnd's flexibility. Please don't try to define = what=20 > is not a goal of pcb-rnd: you have no role in pcb-rnd, you can't set = or=20 > change our goals. Please don't make up non-existing parts ("own = schematic=20 > capture [of pcb-rnd]") and don't spread that as if it was a fact. You call that non-existing part cschem. Why not Lepton? I understand = that pcb-rnd is about *downstream* flexibility, but Lepton is the = upstream kit intended to support every downstream flow. Your flexibility = is designed to funnel everything into pcb-rnd, while what I need is = support of multiple back ends. The TESS electronics used three different = layout organizations at different stages of the project, using three = different tools. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_8A115DDF-158E-4C95-97DC-79903BE54CD0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

On Jan 30, 2019, at 12:23 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu = wrote:

So please don't confuse the = level of cooperation pcb-rnd gets from your
favorite tool with pcb-rnd's flexibility. Please = don't try to define what
is not a goal of pcb-rnd: you have no role in = pcb-rnd, you can't set or
change our goals. Please don't make up = non-existing parts ("own schematic
capture [of pcb-rnd]") and don't spread that as = if it was a fact.

You = call that non-existing part cschem. Why not Lepton? I understand that = pcb-rnd is about *downstream* flexibility, but Lepton is the upstream = kit intended to support every downstream flow. Your flexibility is = designed to funnel everything into pcb-rnd, while what I need is support = of multiple back ends. The TESS electronics used three different layout = organizations at different stages of the project, using three different = tools.

John Doty = Noqsi = Aerospace, Ltd.

jpd AT noqsi DOT com

= --Apple-Mail=_8A115DDF-158E-4C95-97DC-79903BE54CD0--