X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Project file To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20180723152807 DOT 13d27cadcd023b63aa3fd9c0 AT gmail DOT com> <20180723174658 DOT 32979841DEBA AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20180723195942 DOT 605CB841DEBA AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20180724132731 DOT 76074841DEBC AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20180724161712 DOT f0082dda1044e41179fa82f0 AT gmail DOT com> <20180724145644 DOT 122BA841DEC5 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> From: "John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:38:27 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Roland Lutz wrote: > I think the fact that John's use case is much more complex than what you are currently modelling for is *exactly* why you two > should be talking to each other. "Case is much more complex" doesn't sound like a match to me. Why would they work together when goals are not aligned, and they have long differences of style? It's too bad you don't see cooperating with pcb-rnd used along with gschem. Maybe lepton is a way to go until cschem, but I've not had much response when I ask lepton questions. Meanwhile, I use gschem of the same version, gschem 1.9.2 (g53ec833), as several years ago and hear hints there is new development of a few bug fixes, but cannot find how to access these new versions of gschem. gschem 1.9.2 (g53ec833) regularly segfaults.