X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2ATDGDSDQNYANQBAHANEDnhgwp" MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: GWP-Draft X-Originator: 78.11.203.93 X-FactoryStamp: H--- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:33:01 +0200 X-Draft-Variant: reply X-Draft-Parentmailid: 0944b372c6e16491c97cb291 X-Draft-Contenttype: text/html Subject: [geda-user] =?UTF-8?Q?Opengl_PCB_and_mainline_PCB?= From: "michalwd1979 (michalwd1979 AT o2 DOT pl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: =?UTF-8?Q?geda-user=40delorie=2Ecom?= Message-ID: <647dca2ad89a4415ad980da6e5cdc701@grupawp.pl> In-Reply-To: <> References: X-WP-MailID: f0d077799d7bbcf35cf8e98c1f68aea4 X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2 X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000010 [0bPE] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --2ATDGDSDQNYANQBAHANEDnhgwp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, Up to now I was using opengl version of PCB from Peter's Clifto= n branch:=C2=A0 repo.or.cz repo.or.cz Recently I compiled newest version o= f mainline PCB and it turns out that it also has 3D ball in GUI, however 3D= rendering of board is different=C2=A0 - mainline does not places layers on= different heights. My question is: will Peters code be merged into main= line at some time? From time to time I was using screenshots from Peter'= ;s opengl version in my reports, but now it seems that this branch is (almo= st) dead. I don't know opengl good enough to check the differences of b= oth versions, so I don't know what exactly is done differently and is i= t even possible to merge. Best Regards, Michael Widlok=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Dnia 13 listopada 2016 02:21 John Luciani (jluciani AT gmail= .com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> napisa=C5= =82(a): Over the past few years I have been using AMD Firepro ca= rds and Dell screens. A few different models. Haven't had any issues. = All of the cards I have are mini display-port. John L On Sat, Nov= 12, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Bob Paddock ( bob DOT paddock AT gmail DOT com ) [via geda-= user AT delorie DOT com ] < geda-user AT delorie DOT com > wrote: I need a new= video card, that can drive four monitors. Looking for: Linux Friendly, no hassle Linux experience. Three ports for typically used as one for schematic, one for PCB, one (vertical) for PDFs like data sheets. One port HDMI for YouTube etc. Price class well under $1,000. Recommendations? -- blog.softwaresafety.net blog.softwaresafety. net/ www.designer-iii.com www.designer-iii.com www.wearablesmartsensors.com www. wearablesmartsensors.com/ -- www.wiblocks.com www.wiblocks.com=0D --2ATDGDSDQNYANQBAHANEDnhgwp Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Hello,
Up to now I was using opengl versio= n of PCB from Peter's Clifton branch: http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
Recently I compiled newest version of mainline PCB and it turns out that i= t also has 3D ball in GUI, however 3D rendering of board is different = - mainline does not places layers on different heights.
My question is: will Peters code be merged into mainline at som= e time? From time to time I was using screenshots from Peter's opengl versi= on in my reports, but now it seems that this branch is (almost) dead. I don= 't know opengl good enough to check the differences of both versions, so I = don't know what exactly is done differently and is it even possible to merg= e.
Best Regards,
Michael Widlok   

Dnia 13 listopada 2016 02:21 John Luciani (jluciani AT gmail= .com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> napisa=C5= =82(a):

Over t= he past few years I have been using AMD Firepro cards
and De= ll screens. A few different models. Haven't had any issues.
<= div>
All of the cards I have are mini display-port.

John L





O= n Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Bob Paddock (bob DOT paddock AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]= <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
I need a new video card, that can dri= ve four monitors.

Looking for:

Linux Friendly, no hassle Linux experience.

Three ports for typically used as one for schematic, one for PCB, one
(vertical) for PDFs like data sheets.

One port HDMI for YouTube etc.

Price class well under $1,000.

Recommendations?


--
http://blog.softwaresafety.net/
http://www.designer-iii.com/
http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/



--
http://www.wiblocks.com =C2=A0=
--2ATDGDSDQNYANQBAHANEDnhgwp--