X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:57:13 +0100 (CET) From: Roland Lutz To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] geda and sub-distribution unt planning? In-Reply-To: <20180131142114.GE9539@raven.inka.de> Message-ID: References: <20180131142114 DOT GE9539 AT raven DOT inka DOT de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323329-253286208-1517414233=:6923" Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-253286208-1517414233=:6923 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, Josef Wolf wrote: > has anybody tried to plan electrical distribution units with geda? From a technical perspective, this should be perfectly doable. > what about "routing"? Instead of copper layers, real wires are used in > such applications. What kind of target would you prefer? My naïve approach would be to directly use the schematic, but you could also write a netlist backend which prints out the connections in any format you want. Roland --8323329-253286208-1517414233=:6923--