X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: comp
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] pin drill and thickness statistics from cvs.gedasymbols.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <20180114202623.3E2608076F36@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 21:26:23 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

 Since I'm maintaing my fp generator, I wished to see what others
have used for the "thickness" parameter of the Pin, so I collected
the result here (everything in mm, rounded to 1/10th mm):

 http://turkos.aspodata.se/git/openhw/share/pcb/data_from_cvs.gedasymbols.org/

0.8, 1 and 0.4 seems to be the most popular hole sizes:

$ grep : pin_statistics | grep -v Drill | sort -nr -k2 | head
0.8: 6239
1: 5453
0.4: 3226
0.9: 1719
0.7: 1193
1.1: 1095
1.3: 594
1.2: 530
0.6: 444
1.4: 437

O.4 holes tend to attract 0.8, 1.5 and 2.0 annulus sizes:

0.4: 3226
 0.8 1849
 1.4    6
 1.5  652
 1.8   27
 2.0  686
 2.3    6

but 0.5 holes seems to want a tight annulus

0.5: 382
 0.9   47
 1.0   71
 1.3  221
 1.5    4
 1.6    8
 1.8    7
 1.9   18
 3.0    6

in contrast to 0.6, which doesn't fuss

0.6: 444
 0.9    8
 1.0   33
 1.1   25
 1.2   20
 1.3    2
 1.5   10
 1.7    6
 2.0  340

///

My intent is to see if I can deduce suitable "tight", "normal" and
"for hobbyist" sizes of cu.annulus for each drill bit size for the 
fp.generator.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57