X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=m0n5t3r.info; s=m0n5t3r; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=Xkq7bXIlqwnz+ksr3sllb9Rby+Sli+nhvYWpGCa1WLg=; b=TQ5k06CYypfNzG5OEQoqaJ1yJ0TfEX4yv32PP0y/LF3sHChBuCdbtcstziKxiddjl6 bzxguRLjTW5XuOr3i+dq5dVuOrgL/u4ID74bZ5ayNYQU8e0ag3iahy57q8mXV1qRHmFc y4sPPi95KSyXPD0qjCWlPeXsRozVzoPyVWaeE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Xkq7bXIlqwnz+ksr3sllb9Rby+Sli+nhvYWpGCa1WLg=; b=R/87SYV75XlIhDvrYRTVfIfeZwziqFYJ9FPwbFIguUR4BQk3eAtSP5iGJV8UGgXNvR TBpr8HIM5ztGMHs+55VRXL4IIoMR2+fNPPL7F9RWxGA7CYclyONLMaEg7Tn5lx69vLkd vSBbAXiOMuLEnKVjx99OZdv04+Zge2CON+uOASUIBrpEnVEOMkM0GHsHSnnwEyccYfvX 3hdz4CWCRQnzhxYs2X3OTFOD62oWnoxB86BgN3hXQcVrUrBiQ9QB0u8/KBIfyoSJWmN+ IoVxSUt+rYlIxwYpI+84rtVL2vzoc5b5p15A/59sA+1sTQL734LRhj4c+pA0ZulvSvnV E2mA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112keJSq6zxnXlpnqeLP19IvW3Ld5LnL0fE4r+ViZIwtqTCM5Wbo b6gTh2SjdkheU2VvfBmjMQ== X-Received: by 10.80.207.203 with SMTP id i11mr2194474edk.112.1499938225179; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 02:30:25 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [geda-user] [poll] is anyone still using xgsch2pcb? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: From: "Sabin Iacob (iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 12:30:20 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8OMjgHRpv9A8hXbvqmgaNM8NpgrmCemAp" Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8OMjgHRpv9A8hXbvqmgaNM8NpgrmCemAp Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1JDAI9jkwO9JecVcM3eQl6IEF1G8OdlG7"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sabin Iacob To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] [poll] is anyone still using xgsch2pcb? References: In-Reply-To: --1JDAI9jkwO9JecVcM3eQl6IEF1G8OdlG7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-GB On 07/13/2017 09:17 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > Hi all, > > poll time; please answer each question with YES, NO or N/A. > > 1. have you ever tried xgsch2pcb? YES > > > 2. do you use xgch2pcb? NO > > > 3. do you plan to use any sort of graphical project manager in the > future, such as xgsch2pcb or easyspice or genxproj? (please watch > https://archive.org/details/genxproj-prealpha before answering this one= ) > NO > > 4. if the answer is YES to 3, would you use it for > schematics->PCB->gerber > flow? (Please answer yes only if you mean actually installing and > using a tool in practice, not just in theory) N/A > > > 5. if the answer is YES to 3, would you use it for schematics->sim or > schematics->DRC or schematics->bom or any other shcematics->* flow? > (Please answer yes only if you mean actually installing and using a > tool in practice, not just in theory) N/A > > > > > Background/why I ask: > > I am going to roll a stable release of genxproj later this summer. > It's a generic project manager, a superset of xgsch2pcb. It doesn't > use dbus to communicate to the tools. Pcb-rnd still has optional > support for dbus. I'd be more happy if I could get rid of it. AFAIK > dbus in pcb (or pcb-rnd) is used only by xgsch2pcb. Before I decide > about the removal, I want to have some data about how many of you use i= t. > > > TIA, > > Igor2 back when I tried it I found xgsch2pcb offered nothing that "import schematics" couldn't already do, and it was just another window cluttering my environment; genxproj does look interesting (almost like a kicad I can use?), but I'm still not convinced I would find it more useful than alt-tab :) --1JDAI9jkwO9JecVcM3eQl6IEF1G8OdlG7-- --8OMjgHRpv9A8hXbvqmgaNM8NpgrmCemAp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZZz2tAAoJEIIekQf3ltoLW/gP/31owuplCiKHMdTLFtNa1q1f TBcgClHLuk0//SZiEkekZ6u5IidhCJYKJ8Qy4Yo/AotG/66Sf3dkCObGkFzRssdq ILR16ZUK5P5IR5q7PL6fHi1YtFL2WrBhGD4xBuP+wrMluDfZpA6j/zPF/uJpJYH9 tBoxsJJmbfVVdHqg/hBLKVSc2H0aIudFZrOfcEZpqg5uQDMZL8ZHM017rmCvdhHS ZyoHXtYys6Q8DhLRJvSD5afkbYkIoRf7usehYgO9EdXT+C553rJloV7+53bTYCSU D2M95DCr/Z1xjo6bViM9D5JAtiZ75qqa9M6ZRWYOjSwvgitKW3QNBY/ny8bGHTEs AAhkyXz/kkLb6QxSS8tjGZKNaD/EQAjMFt4fwv1yL3gVukCZSSPrvTntaJzd2wWN epfSwMhAQ+8XMxciG3r4J67IMSRiKFD7js3uRFWGZLfaaeu2Jp+SUMYTEf34wShA PlM/kDC83yUTxLtCrwA8KQ9GX3osCg56sy9FQstfl8bsughrTca0WfL8mHeAF7oN uMy5gkT1bETxMCMogNniBBS86gRQgOSE6rg25cWbL/hWsvphbx4YO3RLoPUxO248 Hhag/GvbLiMpFf3D9AWMWBDtCvx00/R0V2e9alLkA2nmgDU6kcXp6dVqg8jDmWSt jPl9k8ettMtautTYD4qT =cjY/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8OMjgHRpv9A8hXbvqmgaNM8NpgrmCemAp--