X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=lxOEeGUxsFlR+BXEQOdgpHvEDFRkLkmeWTLlFCctmU4=;
        b=Vs5v5VNrAWoLXQkpDhLLGbW8idh+xM5KICF4vfK9vdh1SHqVUI7o/UKvZTF5tlMNd2
         xFB0wrQIv4ZahqGiu+0m2CX9/kUVM+gEe/uJU6TzNC4Gs705/OtCoTCfS03szVAmv8Im
         fmcEDk1WTKVokLHnADF0RxbQHaARxLqPRRS2R+kjkvWqWI9yNLKZYyZ5njlfx9uYcNDg
         7n1bdfHGssBMDwmAe9F6mZi86d6wQjRiAxQBhMVaHZ/Syqg+qrIVzZr0LN52JGsDO9DL
         Jmdc/D1PplDKJxnljT+pPXsOwJIajalIyXlsQ1mdC7Xin//7RvCMJqEih4W2eWWjwzQF
         w9ww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=lxOEeGUxsFlR+BXEQOdgpHvEDFRkLkmeWTLlFCctmU4=;
        b=SqCiwOAbOg80JUmM/jNExS8INZNAKFde6jLYo6zBxMsxQPnAZRUc57cIcc/f2cYkFx
         H23yox/Y4e2nOVes+DWzUK8uNB28BnNx6FiHhthRKByGv7KljR5OPZ8Bk4aFhWRiYGWn
         mMxWbttFuuX5cjrOw75zoI6EAFfwUjKsXzLWgB7z9zcTKfrNH67XRUULDO3XrpCt+nR3
         tCmdOrEZqQHLdkV0YNxBaMeog8hNhg9dHCYHxOVLJWk/is8l2ZJ9B7T1oVVEVMQGQ7JK
         6XJiaIh7iyQSqxTZY02MTFVloyR2QMHviRYzWNRB3EIeqakj3mkwHnaCh2jpMCprLmC6
         aiKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kbTwd3Dh4fRKMa202m6XaU9M2KNEfv5X8j+NbO64dnRAHwoyABmmDA38ybPZMTGIvIvIr3w+WFXg7H8w==
X-Received: by 10.223.172.77 with SMTP id v71mr19066428wrc.131.1488841349641;
 Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:02:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGqyy=a4iCEbqzsDFjHAXvpMfziaevQYMjUcSYgUHfNvfdH4gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGqyy=bjaaMDLLybUPdE=3h1eb4puBmHQuJL4YwFy8Nvyv5R9A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAGqyy=a7SFSnSUeBSiZBYFidGB=k3B=DQfHZD=Z6YqLn6FEj3w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <20170306212421 DOT a658cb36967460efbe4ba474 AT gmail DOT com> <CAGqyy=ZZB+Q6T0o4x8OP0LB3pBi0XPu3T+mW4-twTEZTxJsvAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAJXU7q8KZ4ae7EmVzD1nexOPdPqiFJ0fgRhK-nR2GmCgGTwNtQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGqyy=a4iCEbqzsDFjHAXvpMfziaevQYMjUcSYgUHfNvfdH4gw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: "Luis de Arquer (ldearquer AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:02:29 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGqyy=Zs1DBJ0r80oKP0Pak7ate5hM1fv=3ipPQUaZ1nyAwYzg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Rubberband move keeping lines direction
To: geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

2017-03-06 22:24 GMT+01:00, Peter Clifton <petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com>:
> Hi Luis,
>
> Quick off-list reply...
>
> I look forward to playing with your patch when I have a chance. Might want
> to ping Bert Timmerman if he doesn't see your patch in the next day or two.
> (He's the PCB maintainer).
>

Mind you, the patch is just for you guys to try it. It is not anything
I am attempting to merge at all -tabs, code location, etc, need more
work. But the core is done.

> In case you find it interesting, I've also made some attempts to improve
> Rubber banding in my development branches.. see:
>
> http://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2/v2.git/commitdiff/577676a50d4f0f99370936390004c72d3051aadd
> and
> http://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2/v2.git/commitdiff/425b1442c1f615a1f7c5133ebc91098ac5d9e432
> and
> http://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2/v2.git/commitdiff/8e436c6650d68bfd411fa4db0d24d40cf6eb165a
> and
> http://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2/v2.git/commitdiff/3f213ad137db749c4c5ea69a31e3369b4805a6b0
>
> This lets adds support for different mouse-cursors when hovering over
> tracks which can be slid along perpendicular to their direction, and
> attempts to adjust connected tracks to extend or contract in order to keep
> connected. (It was intended to be a first step towards being able to push
> and shove busses of wires).
>
> So far, I didn't try implementing collision detection, and there are
> occasional problems if you have a tiny short track segment under one end of
> the line you're dragging.
>
>
> Let me know if you try my attempt out, and see what you think.
>

I'll give it a go, definitely. Collision detection and bus moves was
my long term target, but that may be too far yet...

Luis