X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=VLWc1KkIk7Dkl6SZmbKoWRqrD3H7Oe7dNBZpskGJhKw=;
        b=kf3s/12KVTdQkHk6gDlqiz921Lb68r+XtT2KQ8vNG9Fj2yU5/oe9PkNJ8UUw9BR+a+
         h14f3ypNP0wlxzphy1s7XK+zfu05ScZwx4K3q3AAEXBCuaDPapd3B+sNmJuSou/PvXG/
         Fn9oZkpmFhtRID/h5TJw9SWFHI47hE/rwUtj6uialalpMDv2A+F0IQTSEc/A9eICzwNF
         mALYZEHHaZsxiCMCZZZ88BSvFAixAZwvVOAZMNkzNLOshhXsN1BnUW6eW/cEo7VjwhWE
         mGqsFGxX+k6UM6VKKwEjF2kHg92E6W2X3+UwAiafbBMSnJfxmQnPXXochDAYgPdySuHd
         mMFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=VLWc1KkIk7Dkl6SZmbKoWRqrD3H7Oe7dNBZpskGJhKw=;
        b=alfxjtUiK4m+QWkvnYUFkcRpaZdkdhAm4TzXImp9l1E99uZqBbUtcJ+DzIU0Pyesfw
         t3CiZKIYEOgw1jtSLF8c6uWcFWJDxk5x0nvwFLIm+uzwO5j4dZCR2fAI5zxlrVrRHod1
         h1y7iPl6w2D7tBw76fJ3Myo/5PtAbqf9t+N84jRJQFPv0UyJb+YqFwsGcb1fuE6lguKr
         T962HuLQXS8JfLa3srcdJzPQTHebaLjvmPHGbNp/lVK7+MdNtKeBZEa5LNyGAxsi/tRx
         4d82zPFpDTAyG1Ia32hNv9JmXNzJGjytJuN6x5khO/RHyoDSMKSJpS5WcHq5KyuKLEUc
         TFXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nyOKsDrLUXCxBqYV72FANbboRoSBIsR2mRm9P4P41T52Q0Ep6X15FtE1F+YCG702DSqcqRCOSbcDD9fA==
X-Received: by 10.157.50.133 with SMTP id u5mr8438909otb.201.1487524410008;
 Sun, 19 Feb 2017 09:13:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHdUXzLP-2-0jbMskxNs+TU59REMdHU-Uwv2PH_q969c_uTgzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1487162236 DOT 3011 DOT 9 DOT camel AT linetec> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702151631080 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <1487176819 DOT 3011 DOT 27 DOT camel AT linetec> <CAJXU7q-HcAcwnXxMvop6foh-ZDkeZSUtGNeT7hEEn4b04gEReQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702152257280 DOT 1532 AT nimbus> <CAHdUXzLP-2-0jbMskxNs+TU59REMdHU-Uwv2PH_q969c_uTgzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: "Eugene Mikhantiev (mikhantiev AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 00:13:29 +0700
Message-ID: <CAHdUXzL90qYtBnh3c0sXOeDNoqV=mfS7ucqu5zfQrGm61G6qcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Recent gschem-PCB import problem?
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I added debian package `geda-xorn' containing xorn, gnetlist2 and libraries.
Installing this package have to solve Richard's problem. Please test.

2017-02-16 15:16 GMT+07:00 Eugene Mikhantiev <mikhantiev AT gmail DOT com>:
> I think this is my fault. I'll try to fix ppa package.
>
> P.S.
> Unfortunately, I don't use gEDA frequently and I also unable to read
> all the messages from this mailing list. So, I kindly ask for mailing
> me directly if there are any problems with mehanik/geda-unstable PPA.
>
> 2017-02-16 5:10 GMT+07:00 Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>:
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via
>> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably ask Roland to take a look
>>
>>
>> This error message means that the gnetlist2 executable should have been
>> installed but somehow was not found at the place where it should be.
>>
>> I'm not sure how this could have happened.  I suspect it's an error in the
>> PPA; I'll have a look at it tomorrow.
>>
>>> Things like pcbfwd and and other non shipped scm netlist backends (Which a
>>> couple of people asked me about breakage on at FOSDEM)
>>
>>
>> The pcbfwd backend works with the current version of gEDA/gaf, as should any
>> other backend, shipped or not.  The breakage we talked about was related to
>> a backend which required a patched gnetlist binary, something which should
>> be avoided if possible.  I think that if there is any consequence from this,
>> it is that we should more actively include contributed backends into the
>> main gEDA/gaf repository and add them to the regular test suite.
>>