X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=RjIs5LPwHjOrqCfMH4J9mpeQ1bmFmRSNDY+hwkUfVvI=;
        b=tiaOG7JfBZpGUsXEGcaF/PDBNK4+MIacYZEp286ZTedBI3X/+SroD/mcuUOkYrJtm9
         SVPUWlB8Bixv9cGExS5q4QrHwQZhoaunk6V1WSUVQIJSBZtsSy0sJCYdqHqhh67TxMqA
         w1opw1aseOKAWFKx5s7rYWZIhNTUuhBwYKEDzxbyT5OG93HLTMRsTzyxtt+PP+H8XcB9
         /b0nzw4Y45HZxKHi7qfOTjQ6Bvkny1CMYju4OttabW/H552/D8PsYAerJbFd0pREeqHm
         8o8kiYXrAzkrW65W/pRQzh6PU8FUg3+29MZuFyRNSOhNk7U+guuUxYvnSnEBSCGmmh27
         hUKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=RjIs5LPwHjOrqCfMH4J9mpeQ1bmFmRSNDY+hwkUfVvI=;
        b=uTYE6ZAdXkwXNeOLE+ql3q+16LXANYQil/wgcSTpw4iwlAsqW6SCtM8e/vXR3/n5aH
         8YudB4Ru5VW7m8uZIMMYhqjHj6sXN1wMfG7O0RvrSB9lf2i0V+gCuupvybNeCJ9G7H/K
         VVPBx1NgzbpTZQEST2up7qEvQ9fdBiBvqVMVyb92dkTuQG7hmpofvkwbXYbwZLhGivF2
         LDdeWTKV4HWbXovuGAAWbCusN/hHUZ2HzhaZQxaSi8qpwkgiaD6Xck0zcAIeJbn1+cjn
         v8ufFfws0I7p3L27IftvK8shDYpGaZJ4ENz8lE59IU9t4JHVztQTydkmD5FYJtACzuCq
         CcCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nEuDPqe8yejaJbvMyUPdeLAo4vqKzsjeZmTGkVVNr2OFUu3MQnpLZ89JSDK10YJg==
X-Received: by 10.25.33.21 with SMTP id h21mr2532382lfh.114.1487351177553;
        Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 20:06:13 +0300
From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it?
 the EDA ecosystem) + help needed
Message-ID: <20170217170613.GA18595@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702130818300 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702160811400 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702161842490 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
 <20170216183850 DOT GB14699 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702170406150 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1702170406150.7286@igor2priv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 04:09:21AM +0100, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:47:54PM +0100, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ah, I see you're reimplementing json and such...
> >>
> >>Which point made you think that?
> >
> >Similarity ;-)
> >
> >>Facts:
> >>
> >>- the whole parser impelemntaion is about 60 lines of C code (I can't
> >>believe JSON and such goes that low)
> >>
> >>- 0 external dependencies
> >>
> >>- not language specific - many languages don't have easily accessible
> >>json/xml/whatever parsers but can read lines of text
> >>
> >>- you sure noticed it's not a tree, but a flat thing
> >
> >Well, any limited implementation is less than a more complex one.
> >
> >>>
> >>>FWIW, I would prefer to have a parser for verilog or vhdl
> >>>available for all our programs as a library.
> >>
> >>Well, MYSP (Make Your Specific Proposal) and we'll see if it gains
> >>acceptance. Even better if you also include your implementation with the
> >>proposal.
> >
> >s-expressions ;-)
> >
> >Kicad already uses them, and you already use Erich's parser to
> >work with them, IIUC.
> >
> >Scheme just 'read()'s them.
> >
> >Please consider applying of <irony></irony> tags to my proposals
> >if you think I just troll you :-) I don't want to mean any offence
> >or trolling, honestly.
> 
> Fine, thanks.
> 
> Unfortunately I couldn't decode whether you will or will not join the actual
> tEDAx implementation effort from the lepton side.
> 
> A simple "yes" or "no" is sufficient.

Rather "yes" than "no", when/if we'll get a request to
implement this. Not now, anyway, when things are in flux.

-- 
  Vladimir