X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 04:23:05 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it? the EDA ecosystem) + help needed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20170216183850 DOT GB14699 AT localhost DOT localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >https://xkcd.com/927/ >(Just because - funny ;)) > Good one! It's currently exactly like that - until you invest that 1..2 hours to copy the code in pcb and the gnetlist guys invest their 30 minutes to modify the printfs ("format" lines) in the scm. Because from that point on we have a 16th format that actually does make our software/ecosystem work instead of the other 15 that don't. >Really a shame there isn't some defacto standard -everyone- (including >commercial eda) uses. Sure, but I don't care if commercial EDA or everyone comes with us. The point is exactly this: do something small and realistic, that we (and everyone else) realistically can implement, even today, and solves the problem. Let's make the barriers as low as possible so it's easier to join. But let's make _ourselves_ to adapt it first. Let's not wait for everyone _else_ to first adapt something. Finally, why I started to write this mail: I'd like to make statistics for the tEDAx web page so I'd like to ask you the same boring question for pcb mainline: "yes" or "no" (to this specific thing)? This could also cut this thread short.