X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m2v9uDVy3gD6YRNq6L+P0pwv9XD3m/m/v0UCK/Tr0ZI=; b=V4m5EkwWSUsVLp0VxaK5QjrEDhk0PNW0xZQI63ISHZxpG5iTR4/TsmprVxMelKftOq ndWZiAHOJBdvfudNpEQ1hruH2LcRN2/E70Xs9p0p2uHz/Guoq0qCAW7XdJXMx0Ok3/Zu 66jrGtjr8mH0C0UEZUF4nPNKDQDuM5d/k0IFyyzBVNmkoMpbHsMyiB0EpqO0yYCw4YTH JaIGIKzgiscyj6HOSzkljLmZ9XdRuOEDDJozaNtGse98wVxgCHec+oL+urLhqpwUgeAg OdGu8K+xhCIkTUmrjFLycjglms4D81ImKMCqTDPFClnBb9U5yU6lpJ+I3oL0th2xjpxa Al+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m2v9uDVy3gD6YRNq6L+P0pwv9XD3m/m/v0UCK/Tr0ZI=; b=Bm3kJYCn5RafjQ+5l5pzpEnTKJRtCj4LnbqpnqSVK7zCWRG99+OAu8PXLRVXSrzA8D d+1dspIGZa9nkNFnMynp7P+gizqmS03z7TBYm53VYYSAqzzYvLiO1nzh1P8XBArHmBhO N+2Rc+fv6aQ92Qn/xeNJHsVSK5QOjRtUSscfoRaZ9xwEBX25xopT+z63mTzVXyIdycr7 Mg+cgi1ll17tBMTnNciAP2zNN88GkifnjCy6q+9n83QQ8r4x8dg5AWukbjLwiCHC1uiQ ddK3lspReTkLoizoxVLKAWMUw1MO1BRhVTn9rqtPXh05BdVmbBSTSC5BBnoIkR20gAI2 UEvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mmsPsJ7hxMC12S/pLSVfyw4iL02xVcrvRzidzlxqImvC2LpxONaVwG4fxE2v2l2Q== X-Received: by 10.25.156.144 with SMTP id f138mr1283227lfe.80.1487270332337; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:38:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:38:50 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it? the EDA ecosystem) + help needed Message-ID: <20170216183850.GB14699@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" References: <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 06:47:54PM +0100, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > >Ah, I see you're reimplementing json and such... > > Which point made you think that? Similarity ;-) > Facts: > > - the whole parser impelemntaion is about 60 lines of C code (I can't > believe JSON and such goes that low) > > - 0 external dependencies > > - not language specific - many languages don't have easily accessible > json/xml/whatever parsers but can read lines of text > > - you sure noticed it's not a tree, but a flat thing Well, any limited implementation is less than a more complex one. > > > >FWIW, I would prefer to have a parser for verilog or vhdl > >available for all our programs as a library. > > Well, MYSP (Make Your Specific Proposal) and we'll see if it gains > acceptance. Even better if you also include your implementation with the > proposal. s-expressions ;-) Kicad already uses them, and you already use Erich's parser to work with them, IIUC. Scheme just 'read()'s them. Please consider applying of tags to my proposals if you think I just troll you :-) I don't want to mean any offence or trolling, honestly. -- Vladimir