X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:47:54 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it? the EDA ecosystem) + help needed In-Reply-To: <20170216173319.GA18720@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Ah, I see you're reimplementing json and such... Which point made you think that? Facts: - the whole parser impelemntaion is about 60 lines of C code (I can't believe JSON and such goes that low) - 0 external dependencies - not language specific - many languages don't have easily accessible json/xml/whatever parsers but can read lines of text - you sure noticed it's not a tree, but a flat thing > > FWIW, I would prefer to have a parser for verilog or vhdl > available for all our programs as a library. Well, MYSP (Make Your Specific Proposal) and we'll see if it gains acceptance. Even better if you also include your implementation with the proposal.