X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=m0n5t3r.info; s=m0n5t3r; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=WJd4pcp9DQX1lgcaG5i3I0DJ/CdiPHJY9A4XchBW514=; b=sF83UQF0MugbZ+b8tdMSagrZUhhVF0kCnq2C+Iotv65V7C7hfgZpMgxCDqZzpYnmJh FlFMZ/p39OI2nFkZphBqU9yoRU9XVhEnFEFoXaCKuJpD8Iw6xe/P8Xuvs6uASn6WzAyN HWMJIufgvd1tHh8IdDLfAEpD2Ktkx8o+TdO7s= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WJd4pcp9DQX1lgcaG5i3I0DJ/CdiPHJY9A4XchBW514=; b=OVT3XIThQ29JzrKEghXJa3yajyivmLScaHXBoZUyKH764HQOEH1gnxc4JwAlBtmIgk mvHVIXEvDdt7EhNWCUellx4VQRl2n7bIs9lhBMGzKhqk0HfS5dth2GtfQ//ZFutoiK5d lbAD/PpHep6oa5BVOjDVWUsWSfb8hR+m3xH9cLvCm09ftWyr1yobfmxuzjjVyrXUxAq3 YWBbjhhJxSEGy8t97TUITlQFTeuMQctjgzb/g0q1eRn/B4PWUVwX5WUEoC17aiHPT6Fv 5nl+FuvpBx+1b5pExY2uEHmd41IMq0SGLtWh8wFERj08aM2sDtZwK7Z/GGO+C08DYtz0 a6Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nRLFp30enOvRhZaVsSRUyiMon5Fv124RjKqaHUx39iiQ03X9TVDxC9M4696PvvnA== X-Received: by 10.223.173.40 with SMTP id p37mr2294002wrc.136.1487249661330; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:54:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Recent gschem-PCB import problem? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <1487162236 DOT 3011 DOT 9 DOT camel AT linetec> <1487176819 DOT 3011 DOT 27 DOT camel AT linetec> From: "Sabin Iacob (iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <03f28b2d-cfde-461a-1555-7ae61507ae65@m0n5t3r.info> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:54:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E091FoGhwe9DGb173cqPWfxNIAOgKvRCT" Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --E091FoGhwe9DGb173cqPWfxNIAOgKvRCT Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="JPsHbC1mNlfRFOXAxqd5Xp0S36256Qg6V"; protected-headers="v1" From: Sabin Iacob To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <03f28b2d-cfde-461a-1555-7ae61507ae65 AT m0n5t3r DOT info> Subject: Re: [geda-user] Recent gschem-PCB import problem? References: <1487162236 DOT 3011 DOT 9 DOT camel AT linetec> <1487176819 DOT 3011 DOT 27 DOT camel AT linetec> In-Reply-To: --JPsHbC1mNlfRFOXAxqd5Xp0S36256Qg6V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable since you are here, maybe add pcb-rnd to the PPA when you can :) On 02/16/2017 09:16 AM, Eugene Mikhantiev (mikhantiev AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I think this is my fault. I'll try to fix ppa package. > > P.S. > Unfortunately, I don't use gEDA frequently and I also unable to read > all the messages from this mailing list. So, I kindly ask for mailing > me directly if there are any problems with mehanik/geda-unstable PPA. > > 2017-02-16 5:10 GMT+07:00 Roland Lutz : >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [vi= a >> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>> Probably ask Roland to take a look >> >> This error message means that the gnetlist2 executable should have bee= n >> installed but somehow was not found at the place where it should be. >> >> I'm not sure how this could have happened. I suspect it's an error in= the >> PPA; I'll have a look at it tomorrow. >> >>> Things like pcbfwd and and other non shipped scm netlist backends (Wh= ich a >>> couple of people asked me about breakage on at FOSDEM) >> >> The pcbfwd backend works with the current version of gEDA/gaf, as shou= ld any >> other backend, shipped or not. The breakage we talked about was relat= ed to >> a backend which required a patched gnetlist binary, something which sh= ould >> be avoided if possible. I think that if there is any consequence from= this, >> it is that we should more actively include contributed backends into t= he >> main gEDA/gaf repository and add them to the regular test suite. >> --JPsHbC1mNlfRFOXAxqd5Xp0S36256Qg6V-- --E091FoGhwe9DGb173cqPWfxNIAOgKvRCT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYpaD7AAoJEIIekQf3ltoLxW8P/1vI/RjbMjVrU2BVqq3p4/O1 3O5Lko9NS03SKdyBxI7KPOvYTFPrzLb0SjLc419rqcWc+QHJmj/knnkj5gVsTGi2 +yy2gmV2Jo9Qhi2uB052ftfrUYzAB6uwdj4VGkBspscna0oCjWS6hjAyNzd+9sDP KMlomK7IYCaq9O/MjKQBfFUJZhHP4KJt3BtdIDgW/SKcvbQ/HY09R3ySBMtkkOAi THAfsw9HaF+BOoAbbewVPQKwdDYVVMsPcMuk5fR9uL2IagEKxM9qNiJOAOnt0g8G HJshbTiBjzfZ+uoerX04oBTitYFtdUFVtk8e82rcfDhNokXGP0xGC4tn81JoEaSz oC3zrfyy4tL2vFcB1zl4XXPV0fKQEUljSlvOfXhJJ4CioCMIcuVrpvFpb3lqoJPB MQYGD52jdiktIitunLndd0PmY6S2IO4gVN+IxXwRD25P0rlNaab9oAUj2GGRjmQw cniK98genK9Q6WsleLxxUBzDhD+V4bNzIYY3HL80eORd7IxGWrVqu4g5mw5rUNGg LctAz+N1bzNtOuLTjTmTJ4E9ok/uB+n38gMzN0rI/TseOVUJ7gZf6PKr+l1wNPs6 L7hm2N5ynI0eRHEbSqHDP+fAuOhvQJQJegeCwArElwxqRUEwKQrz8isYMm8euNLa lQR2LhE7NgVaaqjIDYuT =tsJD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E091FoGhwe9DGb173cqPWfxNIAOgKvRCT--