X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:02:53 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] RFC feedback on release pcb-4.0.0 requested
In-Reply-To: <58A4AFF5.3040008@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1702160357370.7286@igor2priv>
References: <58A4AFF5 DOT 3040008 AT xs4all DOT nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

> Hello list members,
>
> It has been almost a month to this day that a new release of pcb was done.
>
> In this month there have been some 709 downloads of the tarball.
>
> What we active developers would like to have feedback on is:
>
> 1) how many list members have downloaded the tarball ?
>
>  (0 or +1 suffices)

+1

>
> 2) how many list members have tried to build an run the new version of pcb ?
>
>  (0 or +1 suffices)

+1

>
> 3) what was your user experience ? (what went good, what went bad, what was 
> the first impression after test driving, etc.).
>
>  (you can put the whole rant here ;-)

My usage is very limited: I use it as a "reference implementation" 
(cheking bugs reported on pcb-rnd against mainline). On this non-tipical 
use case, I didn't experience difference in either the better or 
worse direction compared to the last snapshot.

Regards,

Igor2