X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <58A20B5C.2040101@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:39:08 +0100
From: "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] geda-gaf fork
References: <20170212125923 DOT GF11686 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20170213133638 DOT GB21523 AT foo DOT stuge DOT se> <eb861f95-3aae-45e1-3873-b394242137df AT prochac DOT sk>
In-Reply-To: <eb861f95-3aae-45e1-3873-b394242137df@prochac.sk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 13.02.2017 14:36, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via 
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>> we (Peter Brett and me) have decided to continue our work on github
>>> and (if DJ doesn't mind) make its sibling repository on geda-project
>>> to better collect user contributions.
>> I want to applaud this step - I am convinced that this allows for the
>> best possible outcome, although exactly what that means still remains
>> unknown.
>>
>
> What outcome do you expect if developer effort will be split to 
> several branches, each with 1-2 developers (and similar number of users)?
>
> I do not see anything to applaud.
>
> -m-
>
>>> it's I hope a fair position.
>> I think very much so! As long as you pick a distinct name I think
>> this is an enabling step in resolving the knot that our beloved
>> projects have been tied up in for a while now.
>>
>>
>> Thanks again, you are doing exactly the right thing
>>
>> //Peter
>
>
>
Hi Milan,

Maybe 2 times 45% is much better than a complete stale mate and *nobody* 
pushing any commits ... I'm not comfortable with how things have panned 
out either ... probably have no say in these matters ... I can't make 
decisions for how people spend spare cycles on projects, they choose 
themselves ... YMMV

Kind regards,

Bert Timmerman.