X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SXpY33ycx7fcnZ4SQzunmMZf66p24VWziaPlIwLv2VU=; b=st+X4X0YQhqERU5bEbcdAOVmRgRg2xFX5ARq93HL8HX1390Gmpvd1spDt/DXo+VzBS 1Srtl68C6SvuDc3DwnzPpAa7WtQlar/F9Zdvsx5U/zxFK9o1qdI6AhB86CXxlc4GpWrI JwmfIh6EnUFdcTCxbJwP23X0Sy7lhMthlMxPSog9f9nTgansdZYthcVpTPm3R+gETs9D J5gUXMtxQUkAnYakzlVDB4etONeR1hUbPYGfJB+9lo9GQ/1ioiIy59Z0b0h2t/KL9IJ+ KPD38ovcBRBh20zzMOW36wqsmb4hqI1qe8Duuxpt1Sx0emvhQcpkydo/RBqpK4FzUg5D ND8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=SXpY33ycx7fcnZ4SQzunmMZf66p24VWziaPlIwLv2VU=; b=cnABy6oa9eGP7EZYVCAaSTAMDreikbxBPQDwQQPIl+Ln8SRhzlkI6ZbVEQBYCwpnpE 1o+71IlMDWEEyH5xmX25W3yzfTJeMakCl5SX42RKWZixspoRLaZ9ZF3B/aZi7MDB2aUY M+NAlVV4sImGscCOBcVXEbKurkTwe+TaTmcMr3t1D3+BZ0qe28Dhm2xRv+ovT0BfnFHD syVz0IA+HuW80h1KvQAkCHOhnKqs3qabTBwUo0WzLFq6IB4VJRTqqllgTRQMCknFg6OX 95aOoQ6ano/uMzIZ3YxZA8Z8doC6ubXU7Y0RjmvjQnu0mzKdq1rEQy0CPtDPdaWQru5M /AcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kMCyMcFbeIdf13GtM1Y3iOnWNO02Kxo7QJAoa7vulm0ls/3ZOsqV88eMkFVfOxjw== X-Received: by 10.46.80.89 with SMTP id v25mr1638249ljd.109.1486931163987; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:26:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 23:26:01 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Subject: Re: [geda-user] gschem gnetlist bug/feature Message-ID: <20170212202601.GE4706@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" References: <95e469bb-5572-fa1d-0c18-ed5abadd10cf AT ecosensory DOT com> <89b42141-9448-1c52-f4be-b4cc41ed7091 AT ecosensory DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 05:36:57PM +0100, Stephan Böttcher wrote: > "Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" writes: > > > Fwiw, we also resisted the proposal to have net= default to adding an > > implicit ":1" if not specified, or diving into the symbol definition to > > check if there is only one pin, and see what it is called. libgeda needs > > fewer inconsistent behaviours and hard coded special cases, not more! > > Assuming a default pin number :1 on a net= attribute is not a special > case, but a useful and natural default, covering most use cases, and > removes a lot of grief, like accidentally getting the label and netname > out of sync, or the need to write extra scripts to please the customer. > > Gruß, +1 -- Vladimir