X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_344A7C21-90E7-4DC3-A349-AED0952FD4AE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnetlist chaos
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702121039420.2050@nimbus>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 08:45:10 -0700
Message-Id: <2BB99BC4-D470-4C71-B09C-F3E2DF4BF301@noqsi.com>
References: <D0E30DB4-3ADF-415C-A95E-B58F09AE054D AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702111609100 DOT 25113 AT nimbus> <CAJXU7q_ogjTmEOjruGJ3od-GYdv_gef0X_yc7Fne1q6kDu1xrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170212090109 DOT GA450 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702121039420 DOT 2050 AT nimbus>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_344A7C21-90E7-4DC3-A349-AED0952FD4AE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Feb 12, 2017, at 2:39 AM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> Roland pushed it just after I stated clearly on the list that I'll =
work
>> on C/Scheme part and gnetlist refactoring and actually started it:
>>=20
>> =
http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?id=3Dee29aa57a0b348fb7f1a42d7=
664ab$
>=20
> Or let's phrase it the other way around: after I put a lot of effort =
into cleaning up the old netlister code, at a point where the cleaned-up =
code was ready to use and stable enough to make the old code obsolete, =
you stepped up and tried to undermine my work by introducing =
incompatible changes into the old version of the code.

No, he cleaned up gnetlist. You wrote a substitute. I=92m happy to see =
both: the only objection I have here is that you call your radically =
different approach to the problem =93gnetlist=94. This continues to =
create confusion.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_344A7C21-90E7-4DC3-A349-AED0952FD4AE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=glzR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_344A7C21-90E7-4DC3-A349-AED0952FD4AE--