X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dCOqStSBNBvXaLFGqoHi7Vj8IP2INylxeeefjCP64JA=; b=b2JeMBwz+Oab8YhySwUdbzxWD5BfkvpBuWou59KFkhAkK6/QY932SDyHqkG/HJNkHL IdJ4mvmvMvSpX0WzOh7oKv6FDf70u8j1DIYs1pMPFrnmJz9cS/iBMw7Lve80edfsmWj3 dEaPBPYKrd+j3dSI8tXqfX7itGtrW9f9PbsI2C+rjV/po68qsYzZPOeao3U3P9puVOP3 PdYmNaBylz9wC+FCkI0e9kHMehQ6XGAAfnY5ZgIu6jiLFu6Ly/8pbeHhN5a7UzqmpFjN CyLdk6pZlpZP7vG85pPOxTQXRx4Bbo8bLbEmui8xE6SPA7CV09uTjRVnUoEg0YPIX/9+ etEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dCOqStSBNBvXaLFGqoHi7Vj8IP2INylxeeefjCP64JA=; b=ljWsilEi+YW2boN1Zau7qznmfIAkSmsWS+4gjJTLyop/djSapt2b5yl77qZDRItAMp 5VFiFBsXCsIYMHqRwy9N9CYH6Gd3W07n9UYpzL/tqE443hd9hZk66eo/Xa7DWIO1ypsq P7PXty4wv5/EqNDy1sWeC6B9lVIayvRtYGtAvPe1RPTLHaj79zaTIXxZhTJ8x2uLLd4+ 4YRh/yC0E476RJ6yiz88Vjq4YHFD0D+l506yBSX2lXmNbE6I/SYTgpgp9m/rD5JCMNAw +jywXrqWrkyiacMq/exZBC4gE0kbkVRVTEayj8qQwl7U9rQ7nGeoLiij9BOLHp338T1u VsbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLZbFvi7ctXKrHPkvIiA/Juj04ewui1nfm7m3VlT1SEqbi0qHjvWNub9ejDc3W45i2uHgikB+QB+6SjcQ== X-Received: by 10.176.75.149 with SMTP id v21mr10660085uaf.94.1485051924411; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 18:25:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "miloh (froggytoad AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 18:25:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] What version of pcb-rnd to test? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403043614126d7a5d0546a5980c Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --f403043614126d7a5d0546a5980c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Yes if you are building from subversion sources and want stable operation, 1.2.0 is the one to use at the moment. svn head has been stable most of the time I've used pcb-rnd, but while Tibor continues on the layer rewrite it is in a more tenuous place 1.1.4 is in Debian Syd/wheezy. Pcb-rnd News http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/news.html On Jan 21, 2017 16:59, "David Carr (junk AT dcarr DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > I'm a long time pcb user and I'd like to try out the pcb-rnd branch. > > The current svn version prints out a warning along the lines of "don't use > for production...". Should I try 1.2.0 or another svn version? > > Thanks, > David > --f403043614126d7a5d0546a5980c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes if you are building from subversion sources and want = stable operation, 1.2.0 is the one to use at the moment.
<= br>
svn head has been stable most of the time I'= ve used pcb-rnd, but while Tibor continues on the layer rewrite it is in a = more tenuous place

1.1.4 is in Debian Syd/wheezy. =C2=A0
<= br>


On Jan 21, 2017 16:59, &= quot;David Carr (junk AT dcarr DOT org) [via= geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" = <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> = wrote:
I'm a long time pcb user and I'd like to try out the pcb-rnd br= anch.

The current svn version prints out a warning along= the lines of "don't use for production...".=C2=A0 Should I t= ry 1.2.0 or another svn version?

Thanks,
David
--f403043614126d7a5d0546a5980c--