X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DD4CECCC-E52E-4028-9411-A3F3955E4690"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Attribute namespaces (was: Can an attribute be attached to text for later inclusion in gnetlist backend?)
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1609141214480.2756@nimbus>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:07:32 -0600
Message-Id: <D2F886AD-4361-466A-8055-2049D5FF53F0@noqsi.com>
References: <20160823053301 DOT 865f671a1b40b5a422e59ce7 AT gmail DOT com> <da433c1d-c711-e0d8-f9ff-a6e843bfe266 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <AB0B2DAD-9075-4AEC-B33E-A57DA050B079 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAGde_xOYrkv-4eWyR4OOTT+XQMPcr4MxmT1xomB9uCneZBCT6A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160824185818 DOT GD14293 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAGde_xNfx_VmpWTm6EwHac2QaKQCRefs1cKK=s9gE8OOuMiWdA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160831221409 DOT GA2585 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAGde_xMDpUFy5P05Mg+zmzDtvbshvZAghR13F4UkSxxMqtw7yw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20160906213426 DOT GA10224 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1609071254540 DOT 1888 AT nimbus> <20160913183206 DOT GA21178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1609141214480 DOT 2756 AT nimbus>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


--Apple-Mail=_DD4CECCC-E52E-4028-9411-A3F3955E4690
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Sep 14, 2016, at 4:14 AM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:

> The spice-sdb and spice-noqsi backends aren't separate "problem =
domains" in the way SPICE simulation and PCB layout are; most people =
will probably pick one or the other and stick to it, at least within one =
project.  So the attributes can't conflict.

They don=92t really conflict. spice-sdb ignores the spice- attributes =
spice-noqsi uses. But spice-noqsi is almost backward compatible with =
spice-sdb: the only thing missing is the model=3D attribute. That =
wouldn=92t be hard to add if folks thought it important. All of my old =
spice-sdb projects work with spice-noqsi without modification.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_DD4CECCC-E52E-4028-9411-A3F3955E4690
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=AeTy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_DD4CECCC-E52E-4028-9411-A3F3955E4690--