X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=uSB9h5GoqJ1HMc+QMXpJQ9pbF9DV7fEEp3iEEuMyf0c=;
        b=gh6uWneoNyUfn3MHNgykQjsnxahLyPceGyCsHjq8Tk3f2PTwyN1JoPdiRc8yFZ7Xb3
         qWoWazTM4KvfIK7sIJ8FOGNSlI6orvnzehChS/cbJZT+ZSLFr2zvOxmt0+1AGK0TW4/T
         iVyw+72W1YD3mR1/Vnd/njyZcgNds3+lpOIhiQHPfIkouqLDSRFev1vHBtv1qdVuOghy
         8LlxZONK4ozMnrZYCXjIBsCxForFmMsw+ecN1Dzi6vhTThjAyACVcmZkhQBJ8OkhNxc1
         WJBCY8pzD7yIPZDNgTh4isI2rFIfO8bvX0Nv2zksScNxUNlifmujKvLYFVZNBTEVeWRZ
         eiOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=uSB9h5GoqJ1HMc+QMXpJQ9pbF9DV7fEEp3iEEuMyf0c=;
        b=ZeaWe9tIBKcjrPsARiGtooqz/NP7gS2UTyzPZ3Gf616NYXJ/Ibmf4gI8zHlwm5IJd7
         9c+rx+UQ0auDFTlu8zgZUG9EMUdWkhYe+zf0ZbmSfIPpxAot5fb6K4iqk2fjXmPbAbEM
         iV7e9jmDdHGFbRYk4mVaQsCNoY6BoSqoO0Cri/xX8GGYcufUFYsUOGfPsatVrnvomwqZ
         rWAElP2mBsCeJT2mi+K5sNWCHkzrUj0VmbQwiiogZPMSPsNmfJeOfTxHP11AEckMQRbU
         vSTkD+uk4t4mlRSzWJsPh3nAOnJ/PeamW3AGNEuC8E4zDUsWyf6KdnZCwNWIupN6MBd/
         Civw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwO/7PokeuZYyvnDWHmDDTq1jeiODfB7DpqWDCj9wwVq9oVhPM+Y+KSn6VXlcJrU4g==
X-Received: by 10.194.15.133 with SMTP id x5mr7732433wjc.84.1473701813465;
        Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:36:51 +0200
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] IPC-D-356 netlister for pcb
Message-Id: <20160912193651.13a108160c912ccfbf7b62b2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <57D6E016.50106@xs4all.nl>
References: <57C74166 DOT 20000 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<CAM2RGhRYtO_5DNYNWYOVk7UDDViWWUCA0r4=V07srqACEn8OiQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<57C7BAD0 DOT 5050902 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<20160901212039 DOT 2e1020af94dafd6b923baca8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<57D6E016 DOT 50106 AT xs4all DOT nl>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I could give at try on the schematics I have and check if export function work on these. That's basicallyt the only thing I could do.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:04:22 +0200
"Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via 
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Purpose:
> >> The IPC-D-356 format was designed to define a standard netlist format by
> >> which bare
> >> board test information can be represented. In the simplest of forms,
> >> this means it must be
> >> able to store netlist information along with XY coordinates, and even
> >> reference
> >> designators and pin numbers (if they exist). I feel like ending this
> >> article here before it
> >> gets unmanageable, but then Pete Waddell wouldn’t be happy, so let’s
> >> proceed. If all the
> >> information that a test system would need to know to verify and test a
> >> bare board could
> >> be represented in a single file, it would bring consistency to the
> >> testing world. IPC-D-
> >> 356 does just that.
> >>
> >> Does it work?
> >> Yes. You will find that virtually all the test equipment manufacturers
> >> either support the
> >>      
> > Then it sounds like a really good idea to implement it.
> >
> >    
> >> IPC-D-356 format now, or are in the process of supporting it. Are there
> >> problems with
> >> it? Of course. Certain special pad types are not supported and additions
> >> could be made
> >> which would assist computer aided repair stations, but all in all it’s
> >> pretty good.
> >>      
> >    
> Hello list members,
> 
> As a reminder on the netlist exporter which still lives in a topic 
> branch for now:
> 
> http://git.geda-project.org/pcb/log/?h=home/bert/LP996319
> 
> Are there any users interested in this feature, and are willing to spend 
> some time/effort to do a test run on this feature ?
> 
> I like to have some positive feedback, or acknowledgement, before 
> merging this feature.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Bert Timmerman.