X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 04:39:35 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnet-spice-noqsi documentation In-Reply-To: <20160910203651.3e03a6ea@floyd.freeelectron.net> Message-ID: References: <8885DFA6-76D0-4A2B-B7BE-C1BD9AFFCDD3 AT noqsi DOT com> <20160906171850 DOT 760f1845663014bb2717461d AT gmail DOT com> <20160910203651 DOT 3e03a6ea AT floyd DOT freeelectron DOT net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 10 Sep 2016, al davis wrote: > On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:11:48 -0700 > "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > wrote: > >> I don't know what is more disgusting. The fact that people are still using >> make in 2016 or the fact that no one has come up with anything better after >> all these years. > > Actually, "make" is pretty good. There is really no need for a > replacement. > > So look at how we do configuration ... autotools?? Yikes! > > I don't know what is more disgusting. The fact that people are still > using autotools in 2016 or the fact that no one has come up with > anything better after all these years. Or the fact that when you come up with something better, implement it, prove that it works in multiple project with a long list of obscure systems it's tested on people say it's bad because it's not autotools.