X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 20:36:51 -0400
From: al davis <ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnet-spice-noqsi documentation
Message-ID: <20160910203651.3e03a6ea@floyd.freeelectron.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOP4iL077q5-yvxXZ8w4jQDzcqjjCkZuCcfw2Juzk1RLnp0mpQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <8885DFA6-76D0-4A2B-B7BE-C1BD9AFFCDD3 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20160906171850 DOT 760f1845663014bb2717461d AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL077q5-yvxXZ8w4jQDzcqjjCkZuCcfw2Juzk1RLnp0mpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:11:48 -0700
"Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> I don't know what is more disgusting. The fact that people are still using
> make in 2016 or the fact that no one has come up with anything better after
> all these years.

Actually, "make" is pretty good.  There is really no need for a
replacement.

So look at how we do configuration ... autotools??  Yikes!

I don't know what is more disgusting. The fact that people are still
using autotools in 2016 or the fact that no one has come up with
anything better after all these years.