X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7crf8NDjEXGzleQ36Xe9fj8FLJ33ENHG/MwptMGtNws=; b=uVcUELFC0InymXszTbzgWsTS0DyHkhg9XTw3GvaFtgeMuwR4zMqwY6jijzhHj2F0mf OgXclDQqW1r4MU5LxbRtBiGfHDUSWGuEKJsVT/JCe03grZytv3+iu+shjPDcc8iqehPh JpVXKsseYAXYEQ17LaF+e6p64H4smZqGG1jcQJf+XPxcJn8kKtDuD3k6vn+UQOmyMUtG ykJaOoFdFBpDzaqLhHjP9hKaEB9+X50MZSqhQBLKo0PrfC7kagyoI67cDJpQFRlKngW8 NNjj6wBpjPBNjJAKQ5uwaYUCUCk/4/okfOGICXGlcu5GArYku9I9vLa/PJaWdYCr2nK2 Xn/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7crf8NDjEXGzleQ36Xe9fj8FLJ33ENHG/MwptMGtNws=; b=FdzhjUb+L/K42cBoxOBBTdeYEKBXBBf+Nl0ve0d9dY77Y9JyLIDLusO+/Wth0zNFol dcEE7vLH5Uherc3ueN73Oqpwz0ys0KKXo8dT5MNzqV1e0ynNFopQET8zE7VMfpN/5kqs s7NE8yKSQp87utp/VudM/bgmLGh/OsfHRPWDvhtiL8yyZbHtcEsqE2LE0IPf2R+viH3z 7ngtlBf1G40rXuzuTYxZBJVkMowj/m5dqyF3abyFOuxVCe7TidSZOPQkbAeuGZCNVdMx 83v5Fx1AFl0tizPEUq/UZb6/cAGUQBqWpcISWfCRsaNT1v+/Jhxri3G5Jqag6evGHonZ 8qwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMbJ0r2UT3BwpZN1H+QdbVdVCemF9trZ42oVixHiJsBzWZ8b2/H26h2kSLy1GN/lA== X-Received: by 10.194.39.232 with SMTP id s8mr9789807wjk.142.1473180382922; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:46:21 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb bugreport: ID type Message-Id: <20160906184621.6f9d81470338acf0e7b5eada@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57CEEF82.4060208@xs4all.nl> References: <57CEEF82 DOT 4060208 AT xs4all DOT nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > in the 20140316 release of mainline this bug is still present: > > ANYOBJECTFIELDS has the ID field as long int, but create.c counts IDs > > of new objects in an int. > > > > (This won't cause problems on the usual systems (with >=32 bit ints), > > but the C standard permits int to be 16 bits wide in which case > > create.c would start reusing IDs after 32767 objects. In the same time > > there seems to be no drawback using long int in create.c) > > > > I propose using long int ID in create.c. Fixed in pcb-rnd in r2938. > > > > Regards, > > > > Igor2 > > > > > > > Hello Igor2, > > Thanks, fix is now committed in master. > > Kind regards, > > Bert Timmerman. I am pretty 32767 objects would be a limitation sooner or later.