X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] favorite methods for BOM part symbols part footprints To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <3bcd08f4-a0e9-3d6b-fb58-5e9b48cdb276 AT ecosensory DOT com> From: "John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:15:26 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 09/01/2016 10:36 AM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I create a dir for each part (heavy symbol) with a big awkward name > including some characteristics and a trailing distributor part number. > Inside go symbol and footprint or whatever scripts or links to scripts > generate them and a link to a Makefile that contains all the generic > build logic common to all parts. It includes targets to export links > to its parent dir, so parts can either be worked on individually and > copied around or exported for use in designs. Do you think this could become a way to do symbol and footprint repositories?