X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=rRQ65C1qUVf6eMoCiEP7y4+/YiuS0KJjwPvcItZY0sE=;
        b=fl3b08hNvHmMbHpvabfvdd/4xWySTr+PDhTlL4W4I3X5g2we9yGiFBD2o9W8jXuj5e
         QF/wl+k2vdDXe1ezabr1/4XtMhTi1waVMIag3E1BhqPayMdjC7sjEIvQDGldmi0CSHXf
         nZDCDkj1+6TXodeaymr6QHI9U3A78g4//IqmGSyAgt/HhO3uYMO9dskvrrdMK1/8QNzr
         GpdLrIWfuKEWUuWaugS7XMMxp58dB4vjFSFLpOQfB7jj/T/qAw3zwe6VXvA41Dcgo7uT
         8QISOGrOSxBdWqBUtJbyXD8RE/Ij2GYAUR1dL3UHjdPm/wsufgjnmS7jAMTS/lJ5BAvY
         Vp2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        bh=rRQ65C1qUVf6eMoCiEP7y4+/YiuS0KJjwPvcItZY0sE=;
        b=MvJXyAn4tBxNF320jRje1emksKLckuoRKxIL5/hf5apkN7xjfWTT9TwRdUEe9+pryU
         k5zi2BPmDOKOglWu9DVEgpvYaZFrIvQNDf8jTaJVZcK2KHKgoVs9Uieny35I4GqQxTey
         15uz8PmSEHzDKbZjSzzVUGF6kkSsNeuRzFFkuNrRbxfYMETsjY6Y/DGPdW0cVS1JGt57
         GQWs3Mra/gxA8V4xyZ1x4Hj++aSy7cZ6dJE/BanE/h6/VNaeUlkzu3iafMk5/5cUSBvk
         LxgrEHbMSDW8dA7HY9c738aCqw5W3SvaNeuXhsK7SZRPKVhU1uHS8hFycmlX02kd8JpX
         yW7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouscq4gjy7htFcP4852nq3xmxEVA9ApATkeXLS4MtEi3b2G89GQFastAbTPVfKrhNQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.141.67 with SMTP id p64mr21210795lfd.86.1470465180605;
        Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 09:32:58 +0300
From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Why we lost another user? -> Re: Why we just
 lost some users? -> Re: [geda-user] Stay or go?
Message-ID: <20160806063258.GA31826@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAM2RGhSaT4_Mg30WQa5e=WDWtyRDKUNPbBYMcbXtsBB8tNrP1A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAM2RGhRMG0eKfzbPaZzY4crqZKEbocZxVuv01DXCgYvP0qjrRw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <B22D0124-1385-4F49-BF8C-269A053369CB AT wellesley DOT edu>
 <20160727171710 DOT GB15004 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1607271943260 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1607271943260.7286@igor2priv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 07:48:27PM +0200, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
...
> a set of patches for pcb-rnd -> gschem back annotation (in works-for-me
> state):

Do I understand correctly that mainline pcb has no file patch support?

-- 
  Vladimir