X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4kAmn4GX22dpakz3+RGnilp3NEo3Jv5K5v9zxHyISbE=; b=xLTuUarXZzm78kzleY73e/IC3RsCw7a4JQsYRD+j8qRBQffsE7De/UYoxI8NNqGKqC WFyDHsmQGGi/8H1R4WAPUCAI9gtS6/uUsoiBs3RMz6rJOxx5GSPDkX5DRhHllgrLozEj zQmix2fu7tJ2sEonjDMqNrgVGXAiikEtLSwpPERg9kqV1/ZwyrwyUmrqAt9dlNfbsZUi Ybl/GJcWuK8OzHxDDvm3kLktaWfoXRRQxumTbY6Fti3KU+r88pK5OhA+LYxb22nKmpk4 lBEDvcHgXz9gT5cTxIm9Li6mvJ3a9JSCIQnWCeMJp3GJUv8DtDeLYwG6wgsHMV3lHtpw wODw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4kAmn4GX22dpakz3+RGnilp3NEo3Jv5K5v9zxHyISbE=; b=TbOWdG636crp5LSidUV5bLx9Nobx0IDE0AcZVu5dY9EYhDZj6OwKuuN010j397tcZr 5cuEAfOTriWD5EvOru+KzTa5tFsOAf8LcXDl0DhmYt5Tm4ouhIh1DNGb+RYV8LmgRk00 UPlOa9GKH+QoXXihOTMjCwxRhwvbyuNeipYp5FoWEo91RTxYvaFx6V49qHzo9vld82j0 qqCK7fn5I77NGEoFUYEfTbTH5e6BhXyhiFyzFghJ7iU7rPrXI0JmszYwI34BRn1JkyM/ H6vFAfeI7vUXbwiJFhPXW+OpH2lainynTi+N4n3IIewGY7ISSvJQ6tkHM7KCedR8czpy jB1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousn24c84fHdp29SD3DA2k6DTrGR2nagDcDHV4C8ZkkX+axU4miYVHCQC5Jl8GGEO1JOsDg0WyREYvelEA== X-Received: by 10.28.35.86 with SMTP id j83mr48127759wmj.18.1469940271992; Sat, 30 Jul 2016 21:44:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2016 20:44:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] OT: gnu make To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 7:13 PM, gene glick (geneglick AT optonline DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > actually, in a simple Makefile, it works just fine as you guys have written. > Something must be wrong with my larger version. Hmm.. It might be worth rewriting as a static pattern rule. They're both less failure-prone than implicit rules and give you much less misleading diagnostics in some situations. Britton