X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hLB1seb2bW3suPMx47HmG5NKoEVRAw95otuNIEFicQs=; b=jEEyJYdjFXuFyOFX6/rVwdvIenNeyekkc20YUfo+urqORmqR+Xm47iNFEHpmP6Ab3i GoJuR4pnJTMMGKbzKfzpQhV+l3jtmYimvXJr1aorIsCZLilbqKoCuswhq0vobFjbB0vX rmpaqT6Bir3HmjDZcFprEeiNoIZwn7WGlO2AC5RS9Beyd/drFRSvVEQH/nLue09BbGJO 0YlWEQr9BSFPskZBou8cfRiX0L/XsG2LMgTJvTK2HOsHfN4iaD5r1gAnv7pYVCaD6c/p HsHH1w7N4lK92clcI6nROPD+HfM/RLVW8vu5r7WHDvHYQxtb7ew1n1Jn2IoMzpOsvfgu Szuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=hLB1seb2bW3suPMx47HmG5NKoEVRAw95otuNIEFicQs=; b=CCvlnek0Hzq69qb7nXqyZkprDrQiT0a3VKnqAQ9p7ZBFRA2B+/81nHhxLdmVin3f+d BIynekh3ttw1RqO3fr5RgA8vGGPGaeb5NPNAj88fZfO/nXnmvTQE10cBm6OqDW3VR1Lz rTTx9dnth/GnsB6iCYnK8+Zw0u4dkdcLiTAJvtnTMpERudCejBeczfAlzNwOEH+npeZ9 DK9dv00ZFzeAm8NE4y9ZZWQdo5NvefVKNQpMjG2pfD1zbv7XvsORBjIAdZNk5FofeEGv UeGxjGRLXNxKIIHJ9+LmcpPDMxC+QXK9ZDfLNCrKxP2yF7USF9VC7KQ6LvHMP3sePv3n fjyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutsOUFKKd1SRQJHVzd8R0TjDykUr7u8zcqwEQDiYnKStFQKQ6HWoxh8EVbWfSjBrQ== X-Received: by 10.25.17.213 with SMTP id 82mr10346155lfr.119.1469639833182; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:17:11 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Why we lost another user? -> Re: Why we just lost some users? -> Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? Message-ID: <20160727171710.GB15004@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk James, On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 09:07:04PM -0400, James Battat (jbattat AT wellesley DOT edu) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > Is a functional version for Mac OS X out of scope? Or maybe > other folks have had success with geda on mac. I have not > (well, gschem is sort of ok but I can’t get pcb to run on a > mac). No, we just have a disappearingly little support from power Mac users like those who fixed things on Mac before. Your reports were helpful (as reports of some *BSD users). There is another part of the story, as you know. Some underlying libraries used in geda or pcb, or even their dependences, might have been broken on some platforms, and therefore again, we need help from Mac users to learn if this is the case. > > >> * Lack of coherent documentation for new users like myself to get off the > >> ground > > > > Should we have a manual that breaks down things for people who want > > the simple answer? Basically instead of trying to explain each tool in > > the chain but just how to use them in a flow? > > Yes, I think that workflow-based tutorials are particularly > useful, especially for new users. The gschem->gsch2pcb->pcb and > Your First Board tutorials were particularly helpful to me. But > they could be brought up to date (such as Import Schematics > feature). Please offer your changes, I'll add them. > I would guess that my goals as a new user were not unusual. I > was looking for a workflow to take me from schematic to gerber > for a custom board. I didn’t need to run simulations. I had no > desire/need to work with a netlist. I wanted to hop between > schematic capture and layout without having to worry/know about > how the connection between the two was handled. These days we have no active pcb developers on the geda-gaf side. I used it and worked on it before, but soon realized I have no time/resources to work on both projects simultaneously. I would be happy if, say, Igor2 or somebody else who're working on this part of the project, posted their patches at least here, on the list. Unfortunately we could not achieve even such sort of collaboration, yet (probably I'm one of or the main culprit ;-), though I still hope this will change in the future). > I understand that the use of gschem does not lock you in to > using pcb, but the two can certainly be used in harmony. A > coherent set of documentation to guide new users down that > (presumably very) common path would be helpful. Again, we have many wiki document authors/editors. If you could write or have already written anything useful, I could try to give you permissions to work on the wiki, or, at your option, just write the text here, I or somebody of the current wiki editors will add it. > > 1. > > 2. > to simulate it?> > > 3. > > 4. > > 5. > > 6. > 7. > Makefile to automate it?> > > 8. > netlist to simulate it?> > > All good things. As a new user, I would have benefitted most > from #1, 6, 7 (and also an easy-to-follow guide to custom symbol > and footprint generation). There are some nice docs on DJ's and other developer's sites (I was going to translate some of them into Russian though never had time to do this), such as, e.g., Stuart Brorson's site, which now doesn't work for some reason. That was reported a while ago and this is the way to lose or to not find useful bits of documentation which is not published somewhere else. While I do something like this myself I still don't understand while other developers do it such way ;-) We could name such valuable docs here and then ask their authors to publish them in gEDA wiki instead of their own sites. -- Vladimir