X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Why we lost another user? -> Re: Why we just lost some users? -> Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 04:25:55 +0200 Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-55-137.net-htp.de User-Agent: KNode/4.14.10 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com James Battat (jbattat AT wellesley DOT edu) [via geda-user- Ht4Cp5ncgjRBDgjK7y7TUQ AT public DOT gmane DOT org] wrote: > So is there a searchable/browsable archive of the mailing list? > The mailing list is funneled to http://gmane.org . This is a service which offers a host of mailing lists via the UUCP. This is the protocol of the usenet of old. Consequently, you can read the mailing list withe a usenet newsreader like knode. Posting is possible, too, as I do right now. As a side effect gmane keeps a search-able archive of all posts of all participating mailing lists. The geda portion is here: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user gmane is mentioned in the geda wiki http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:mailinglists#search_the_mailing_lists However, the wiki indicates incorrectly, that the archive ends in 2011. Yes, there was a hiatus when geda infra structure underwent certain changes. But I had gmane add geda-user to their archive again in spring 2012. The next line in the wiki mentions geda.seul.org. This seems to be almost completely obsolete now. This website formerly hosted the core of geda. Now it barely mentions the project as the last in a list of open source EDA projects: http://www.seul.org/ links to http://www.gpleda.org/ I don't understand the background of this although I was already on the list for a few years and a regular contributor to the wiki when the changes happened. The changes were disruptive but opaque to ordinary users. IMHO, the repercussions can still be felt. ---<)kaimartin(>---