X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QYqzTmRUzJ/1aZ9P2A3DGfqvecq1sR0iTGYELE/iqz4=; b=pSDZL+PeuUmiqbs31PhsdT1vPuBzeROA3zMDDx6fJ1s6Dj8XRSw/J1KB9wKRjjwN59 WsjFSkRFv/0SBAOzQqI8AOqPka3CFUWU26ZArLRrLNd/4+J+GxcV8f4KSFjk9/9K+rlt pTHAW63FsMib+AR1GQ6pp+g5vwobpKCP/GbmARtolPWbee5soMRxIyYzWkKKBtaRDpEp hs75Y9+qOC8ufAilepghxORyuRb0qCxFTCMTEbk2o/sU4/RwXqv/bKcfXnkpBzFGLIO1 vLeD+BE6pGiR2LU9JdEV8cBOcejwB0mFkFydyatjJTl9jhD/RNO7N0qBlBDm2+iRbukL BvmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QYqzTmRUzJ/1aZ9P2A3DGfqvecq1sR0iTGYELE/iqz4=; b=RVi9zAWOQ+mkYjpsVrpN5O0U1QIOnudhK8hdlflj3QhQ8Ohvq6W5IIf7W3dDr5dm16 Pawq0u3RejFwidw8Z7K6aPbW01wG//oFxg1Mck147WmNRA1HABXexQuTmBMEPJStqvtr vnY4eyA4YEKdj1Pwjevz2ZuAM0DRAPqV9bFMIrjW26Dk0MvpZ9sih9nREoOAZR1Tsxgg F1N49fuhp84cas1/TYWdutHddwgWSCQ7YLeVVMwIsm4VNTpGO7zw9fG2M/48EG7Os68R 2excX/cyYg8/egz62lyJ5EYqNEPhZ6pfsieDXAXxx5g+SKHmQLddR0Y+LBFGnJRz0IEf y9rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutLpoqhbWpy49OFygcXmNII6kI9SS+ZbOrpj4cfaeRDKTBgswsLvRcKk5M5GBYIxQ== X-Received: by 10.28.130.208 with SMTP id e199mr22918510wmd.14.1469476352719; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 21:52:27 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? --> pcb limitations Message-Id: <20160725215227.749e6b7d5413325b556e89eb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <258b7bd1-2868-a900-eef5-776bf4419970@s5tehnika.net> References: <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> <481e79b9-15d6-965e-8f14-4705b20df550 AT s5tehnika DOT net> <20160725200248 DOT 6d58c3c01b14b4863f9f8680 AT gmail DOT com> <258b7bd1-2868-a900-eef5-776bf4419970 AT s5tehnika DOT net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > gschem work pretty well, no problem to draw any circuit I want. > > Gschem has its warts, but its quite a lot nicer than PCB, I agree. > Still, there is much to be done even with gschem. I say warts are mostly workflow related. > I ve never really felt the need to inser graphics into PCB although as > it is now, it can be quite limiting. Arbitrary arcs would be nice, > elipses and elliptic arcs, beziers too etc. Not graphics but to draw any shape in any context like all the ordinary drawing primitives within pins. Possibility to define a pin type which could be used for all pins in a particular package type for example LQFP would be very useful. > But some features are awesome. Coleague of mine was left flabergasted > when he saw how easily did I combine several PCBs onto a panel without > any extra tools before sending it to manufacturing, for example. Yes ordinary copy and paste is simple and powerful. There is however a selection problem which could be solved by adding a "sub layout" attribute to objects then for example all objects including traces belonging to a power supply could be selected and moved. Regards Nicklas Karlsson