X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EFeStasZdUGhJ7DEPU11jP3oqjD8AgMBJ1KMJd2lHeI=; b=IMJBM5k6XAC7AuhgoFZvCQxAiVEBK2HySMpJhJ9CXdyZFnAzGHrIjj+QHC3cxlHA7Y LlwvORHWrSrsrAdLtmbaaPmXxB4RP5gRT7zzminLaUanbwpDuG4OFFySGDgO+2QnJKJT 01vlo3L7F5XcMX2tajOh8X7ZWOHKSDcgroLbT4YTRhP0GSotBDInogM3flLR+rhPTX8q P/J9iasmSsaauKcs6IsyTRgRtqQe4EXFCfwbv1WsE38zkzlvJQ4vjhqqe2dmddLduciy +lHwZY1fcIN7xkkfaxk98D8ZIWertP2yi7/bT9DVoGydd25Erfz/+kXnSAuezrz9Udhe MZgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EFeStasZdUGhJ7DEPU11jP3oqjD8AgMBJ1KMJd2lHeI=; b=QC3qeeJBdFKyOAOd8kGO2KCP5HpfvpCDI6vtIKhHiV4X0PbPenxhn0WDpEzqzy+UI+ sc/qqFhoqi/9TNrrHR7iKzxQ98lJcmIS7QjVWyLoGZm6zT9+37iYJr+K1csMOZbWJu7R R1t8ZO5V6l9gu2zaM+I6ZEe+xKB4JJdNcKcippiF20aoymMbf9svhImf71s2VQtfwZZU arHK6EqxQFtNnv1VaPcDVW9nex+TRU7RnZFVC7KU+EwLjHWfKVWl1XVwkFMmnk6a0sKc NicgDoO6EMOnfRCltFuaH/7jKlf3DryVbfOxeqftr0w5LXW1M9iK8yZeA8+A6wKN3mDP t7Wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuuhvfX/ykl026BqARF/kEOtZFOtP/UsU8NYp3YBEiVQ0fdEnxvmAkeKLZsXOyyTQ== X-Received: by 10.28.169.203 with SMTP id s194mr12994867wme.95.1469306895747; Sat, 23 Jul 2016 13:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 22:48:11 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stay or go? Message-Id: <20160723224811.2e9f59de5a5898c59003ff85@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <98D1C4E4-581D-4A03-94E4-E0330960EADF AT wellesley DOT edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 2:16 PM, James Battat (jbattat AT wellesley DOT edu) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Dear gEDA folks, > > > > I’ve used gschem/pcb for several (modest) boards now, and love many things about it. > > I do not love what I perceive to be deep friction and lack of cooperation among developers. > > That may be healing as we speak. The trouble is people trying to force > things. We can't force others to always code what we want how we want > and we can't force them to always play well together. > > Even in our most productive days I recall a lot of vitriolic emails. > The difference is that a lot of the original developers have other > things in their life now. We need more people who share the vision so > please don't leave. I share the vision. To draw schematics in gschem work well, attribute handling is not perfect and pcb have some limitations. With attribute handling I mean pin mapping, BOM generation and similar which is handled thru attached attributes. I think gschem use non of the attributes itself, just assign and display which work great. Vitrilic emails i just don't care to much about.