X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cvgZIpnGmNAhE12iXoIRjmVu4PQB1MNyQGbize0SB2A=; b=MKN3wBM0npMWxvsgquf2ytydEwWDlmZnwmg63iYSXTDT5cBkZ5rCdKxXYa1DaPwO49 KoBHYc0rKWWURT/B1f39GURJQ4KKK+HZgaW63dYv/q9WyBgsli2IzPTUagupnXRalSEl dliyEIIG6bgtCpP0C7WWOuUkLbU9ViXMAlJ3qWsgEz1Wvs+BkAu9CsHWkjAxEtIBQdw+ B62eqrOdc6snq7CCcXnEIBz1j4j9F6bn3uM51Ky8zWL0xxhUEymhQxzXxGJVIl689qUt Wp/g3OctHESXcVLawB4X1rMjrXvTVdm1d3uhBsuIZUfQrJYR9tGNzYGNgeMGgm3yvx4J PnSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cvgZIpnGmNAhE12iXoIRjmVu4PQB1MNyQGbize0SB2A=; b=fIXwfTrn8jbNtXGdboivM2/s9IyxHT66iXPkS6XpeNglI5yPvTNreHL/73IEOWaKr6 Dowo20ZnQylu5Zo/bP5KXbr8/eADFvhW4gEMDgibxI3AsPYcPHZRcGt9jlwVCOAc3sON IZ916anIZ4hCIej/2cOyjRrLe9wB1uE9Wsq0YQN5PhUnhdardMwYNMpX4KtWN3q+tIg1 35NTpcWMDaUBebI6dWxp3qVfzLfT2gEyUbBqKCDxxHMgstDqF4jsfHiumblFFQ6Nzrbz 9Y/fhA83um0N0DM/661oPFO4uB88J5hHTvoZxRL6Am7f58WTKZrSiscOJPqviBUcVrIX VphQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKxwL7WBGRDMdtKc4uYFd6a/EET2qQ2LQ+rlwCbtDsBn/3Gfrk/VtEsqvkF/WWRqQ== X-Received: by 10.112.50.144 with SMTP id c16mr5082403lbo.128.1457803999892; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 09:33:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:33:14 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gnetlist shorting wires Message-Id: <20160312183314.22800431e9b38bc211cac66f@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20160312145647 DOT Horde DOT toH7mUmRASGNT3axa-gppQG AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <20160312175302 DOT Horde DOT Ll10lTUHG4l7e2SKVPAGJE4 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > What you've seen is the lowest level of a multi-level hiearchical design. Toplevel has sub-schematics which are instantiated many-times and contains sub-schematics itself.. > > Ok. One problem is that you’re not using the right IO symbols for hierarchy. You should be using in-1 or out-1, matching refdes of the symbol to the corresponding pinlabel of the symbol that represents your subcircuit. Here’s a working bottom-level schematic and the symbol that instantiates it: > It must be exactly this IO symbol on the subcircuit? Or are gnetlist looking at pin attributes so symbol on sub circuit must have a pin with correct attribute(s)? Nicklas Karlsson