X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=05N/Rk8Zj2vWx6S0sxP0qjfmkcI01vgTw4PYI6dCVWc=;
        b=pABwFey3NYX2EGis0QoC3coPg5CWXEvquwrL/wBuDf48Eu7Tb4Zbome785z2ARk7Oe
         /DB+CRz2QAMaX0dnQdOwFNKlW1W3j4K8PP7akQBrMIvIMJzFhpjovx+INSBXBK4X2ql7
         +iqjfPtyKmERvMk3GjmCf/P8UvA2vGHbOKDNtsrbssP+NeDzAXniGvla4AHPYSrtaCfC
         QdiH7w1jjBteFvJj3qvSlSDNhhDQuuOaz6so+CMyp1P278DiaQMHTtrNc8LBUoqSRf/I
         HrvJvu02Hywetvl/x5bQEd4bfew1B46xfULfIxof6qh5ExQWKEjtqta8ZqFlpcqjkM5j
         a+QQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=05N/Rk8Zj2vWx6S0sxP0qjfmkcI01vgTw4PYI6dCVWc=;
        b=kD8jiHulCnlHrR0SBoT0scu1zdKfR1zD5leACjiDtDcXixZi6+c0m+3oc6Yukw+H8V
         3hbXObTRiulqzo04Jfv/p2MljSLPBsDR8hPWso8Qt+AdA5VTA377dcpK42QeBSFtKtbU
         rXvcKm1n9Ayvlkk74L4Damj3fXFqNdukkU0unjXpzrCRN1lqWu81ZGuoanslG4P+nahj
         Ws1HX3SoqNy3Pw4f9VORRh9Bblhk/s31qwzrs+KX2rNJPahhxlbHBwfi8N180dfxCHLm
         0wTy1f7Z9WMT5KH83oUohXsm/6iWrhmZqV5I6Ugiql7hyo+CjOD68ZVhxghrZ8o0xziz
         SWgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSwbZznDhO2HSwTBE4qRvZOXItqMrIg/w2fF6oHbjSJjm+cMjUWKbQcqY0XaVKdwkg7+JoyqQdde0cqtA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.71.70 with SMTP id s6mr3982941wju.1.1455315512331; Fri,
 12 Feb 2016 14:18:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201602122148.u1CLmdjQ014944@envy.delorie.com>
References: <CAC4O8c8zXPAOa0owpJKz55Gs+oSKf7fUU9BjGrrKupWzhhCmMw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602122148 DOT u1CLmdjQ014944 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:18:32 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c8Gm3JkyoJL1xRq1AvbuvGVNaF+4mRZBt6595tp=xjcPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] does Select->Select all found refer exclusively to
 things fouond via netlist?
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:48 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Are things found in this way the only things Select->Select all
>> found refers to, or are there other things?
>
> Nope, that's it.  There are other ways of finding things, of course,
> like the 'f' key, though.

Does it mean anything else for an object to be 'found'?  If not
perhaps the whole concept should go away, since the Netlist dialog
already has Select and Unselect buttons.

It seems that Lookup connection (F, Ctrl-F) always sets the found set
but not the other way around, which is sort of weird since the
interface suggests they would be independent.