X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hVJMrA4by/GtzN9Jt3ZxbN6aMWuukU7y0GQiIgmmMP0=; b=HRFN4hw/P5SiQug700o5XuS087qiH+xNkYMBZHPVsMFfdpFLkxmSLf+AXIjoUogJUn rjKWhS9s2u7tTTGUN+GU1FZrDLE9Ugo1gVqo/HxbB+KfPANHI3YtNnUwZpZuv9TP7x4K YD1F6ITLkvLOXSnecGxUnf2beWiW0i5k1l1Ruad8RbkSyWUR2SaFACh7JJmG/jfi61wD jWv6Z8uIARnFCDqYubOA2ekcF+HxzXmFNDyRm++Cx+XS5EyqoyxvV8N98uVJmMCuPocq QFItG9yd9KUg3IzdK8W3XTmVEBUIH6wA16WYyha4Y6vxbIWCnwT9fk/OmcDm2psvTbG0 piZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hVJMrA4by/GtzN9Jt3ZxbN6aMWuukU7y0GQiIgmmMP0=; b=CfygqPP/BfnMIybQ/tWqEJohWrAvWS5ogQ0uGz4iDI781jsWIJUAsvBTRzOme+HH2r 14Lq7db7+oR1Z3Vz76rUmRVYQgJVDUBQbBxFEXASiLWgAFX2AMZw4phe7nCpSPTH/yZ+ 9bSWoKfhKg8xESs4H/OzgQSGPx4X7oRkvM7pDVXiXP+CbNyJVfwlLd5S/l2pcIn1+swR hicL1W2WZIRUCD8/Su5bPAySerygFrsG2VelzCHkCXckJyEXn9//R/kFlfdVH66QdZRF ni2SbJf+cjQJuQ353CxyjXoOLNqkv9G64Ln8LHGnAU7GZ/HNIDHkQkH1+Iqd5dxMS/JS 301g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORsx+yPGrf0+Z5nz51ZHx3VvFg7va297PAS35hOuWNBE2GuEI1ApC8jxU7fvwpdRQ== X-Received: by 10.28.229.201 with SMTP id c192mr7329833wmh.103.1455055050934; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:57:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 22:57:25 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: Full Polygons Message-Id: <20160209225725.2bb691393030aca6fc15c225@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > The "lots of linking polygons" approach we currently need as a workaround > is not ideal, as combined with the "biggest piece keeping" can require a > tangled mess of drawn polygon shapes to successfully fill an area bordered > by tracks. Lots of linking polygons is time consuming and annoying. > > The poly code with it's combination of holes, clearline, full poly > > seems really ambitious and I'm vague on exactly what it's trying to > > achieve. A polygon with cut outs with size equal to clearance size? Then there is of course the connectivity problem and elimination of dead copper or shards. > The "PolygonType" object is certainly somewhat overloaded with behaviours :) > Peter Nicklas Karlsson