X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=gDAvZ4IsL/A4SFX8nz5Z6/wx24aYCJFXgHNg2MjzLx8=;
        b=QZiy77Om+s8iQyknGQk0plXhzzZZN2nBETU7y/dVojRnx9dj9xzW+YjbCHLcUGHsjZ
         f865W05VqGJ2yqYGzeoU0ri0QudhDVulkG+XYpWbopqdOpyXqZod9AFoNe4lJr/XgxBp
         hZ3Ao8PuNRZHBX79Wq3t55gA6rCflCcc2H3YP3b8JrBGshYLvuURwR86vVdeU+2N+cQ+
         n1WpPwv8Y9Q4sEFYTVy+NRsaqP+lzJLpzmiuFTf1qj1Nsv8I1VbVa/pRdYg5132ATfGu
         tizUFDGVqc2Y07I1g84l0wQFe4D42IpOmPIkN3EyUYHBVoIUh+kKZyygYb7NUG7v/A/V
         IqIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=gDAvZ4IsL/A4SFX8nz5Z6/wx24aYCJFXgHNg2MjzLx8=;
        b=WHVKfbXenpHg9cDSzNG/TLZdnO3Wgw2Ddm2Ft3yewBg+ttDtK1XP79to8eePEwI8fn
         IRWov5Xqq8qC+tikSHuW9VDPPIQSYXU8/6h0UBmKqrwfCd45my1n6WfBUUIIHDgTfhzI
         UnSBhWvUzKckVcJVwL5vvL/2TtqZOVDAohF7oL9VDy5H6p2gI2xNyYg6wv/y7HXd21VG
         TY+kfzK0a/NB4z2ZNwCsLLLz5H9M8RtNzRPtW4H+l4QvE++5oqInggW/dQJkkgVTfwRf
         FWtb0s2PKcZnPioRcSLBHjqb118AJLhyr7HxJXl7y0puJGNnpcq7eG+DM39Ic2WJQITc
         Qu7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSQVkM6IpuIe3bfk+wVhxlxHGBzF2rjSDL3bTuVFjEQPgdHWKjAiNaI1ZttIe+0Mz3WKr/guLST/0WUcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.19.164 with SMTP id g4mr31294511wje.120.1454996204456;
 Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:36:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201602090521.u195LYdK025191@envy.delorie.com>
References: <CAC4O8c-XG7N2Y8YxfrgX-zER5kS9n1Pq+xwi5UMLoS8EpadYRw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602090508 DOT u1958Mv1023697 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c8wYq8uFzsY2gMnj4z=msWJA9KJgeTxSR27-2NxjF0Dgw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201602090521 DOT u195LYdK025191 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:36:44 -0900
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c85TCxrDe1WBJkxXQFV-Ob8C5Ow1-q2OoSM5f=7f6DnFg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] what is 'New polygons are full ones' supposed to do?
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:21 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> Yep, thanks.  Shouldn't that be the default behavior?  The alternative
>> seems much more surprising
>
> The default behavior avoids small disconnected islands.

But it also nukes the slightly smaller half of large poly after you
run a line through it, which is pretty weird and most people aren't
going to figure out that this option is the culprit.  I guess the menu
entry could get renamed to give them a shot at finding it but unless
small islands are really bad for some reason on seems sufficiently
less confusing to be worth it