X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=xqTSgUa4f9BQbzof4WvOBoGpdjygTm4NpMsd0BR5IsY=;
        b=LgFdhkKG6Wd5ElbQoXcmLwzdQngq9y6495D+FjlCaZwYx3nNVcUUK/hltb9CNI/FlJ
         wJV9ioyzLXX/5MuvojzVYPp/gJfJUVqOUO7AO4T5WkrbH8HCL+ATSuH9kzW9zkDgFEN7
         JzxgldyYteCQ6ngcX2+mfgzNSyDz57gsGpN1OWIV2jBxIoXQ/8cn9rzRpUBc2bTGo+SH
         0ORaZnTBTm8mxpB58/zDQQ7Z6nL1v6326gl05YNVeLB4vwNkxt3jl3pUMNPm9VIzcURo
         ReIiL7yLYtrP3zPCRv3nRH1CckTeKsEcKpKhbu0UTRhMhSteOIHOVIJeElD+zWrr5dpg
         1i6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=xqTSgUa4f9BQbzof4WvOBoGpdjygTm4NpMsd0BR5IsY=;
        b=CujcsORtWUCnsF9f9KuxPwVJEnubHnV+abVAq5ik3u/rPk+nH7A2ULE14IQ9+BVPnw
         tjZho4Tk2Zctoj8T6/+SofplDfBjHqOC19uDbrFasPypRwPNKiVhE1fKUW8J6+m1fIf7
         KfXg2uTvC3tOThDnEjCdNjIYmXMLBxQFPDzOEy83+3+IArhPicNjzFAqNB395ptPHag3
         kog3m+i7vL+ETjlM3hZTQlgBJ81GcjtKK8d955uWNGdYhsdEvNHmLq7T5E/3GQIhqa6v
         3Hl3xca5D9NVmhCu0I2zYAlq2TnL6ORIUMiSuei9vnTJg//7FvqixPCv/Dy40FZVxH+S
         Cbhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORPackIp9qUoL9rp5Js2eTgCeh2DzCdCG7kE19v61xwnEhDwv6CbmT94XveKzupbDnR3861DvMLW6ixmQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.204.201 with SMTP id c192mr1530029oig.125.1454550613049;
 Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:50:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c_-VaWshx+kQt4tse3DU2V=73OV-G+thwKabgW9cGt7TQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC4O8c_-VaWshx+kQt4tse3DU2V=73OV-G+thwKabgW9cGt7TQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:50:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPYb0EHPYF8NHeuOhCH-aJg+DEiZGSgGwj9QW+=qG+B7SpcrLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Possible file format sample, questions, YAML vs JSON, etc.
From: "Bob Paddock (bob DOT paddock AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> What I've sadly concluded is that it would probably be better to go with
> JSON, like the rest of the world.  If everyone wanted YAML instead for the
> cleanliness

It was my understanding that YAML could be self-referential unlike JSON/XML?
I can see self-referential as an advantage.

-- 
http://blog.softwaresafety.net/
http://www.designer-iii.com/
http://www.wearablesmartsensors.com/