X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=robspanton.com; h=
	content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id
	:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=
	mesmtp; bh=yzGUASYTsDZwy/htuaRQ8CZ4wvA=; b=lAFuOMohuN5cAuT6C+HmY
	bTXynP+rbYf7fJdTU5Sv/TWw2CQCjPrUrWgfLNGIieCZHUKubyTzxHIifF31VEwA
	6ZPoArgFa6m9mXyWmpdPAlu1GmXilluDiMv5B4Vb9wUjSTsdSw14hyIRuVfY8DR1
	JBbzbw7aovmg26TT2DLo0g=
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
	:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:to
	:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=yzGUASYTsDZwy/htuaRQ8CZ4wv
	A=; b=eyVdBnQepzosT4SLts0TmjeRZTLTXb10b/ktF2gzgCJjj8xQEc8bw0LD8t
	U9eaTcFoyCYzZHOcsuF+qi1bR/bao2etV1BSXhzRAStA3PGL3GM/0YgQywbrTiPj
	bB+QjCH/fO7w6lT+bpn0NOYz+6ADOdrlFQiVYtR+sYVL4YVe0=
X-Sasl-enc: 4RlZzFxJYOc0Q9Pb6/SwQKvI+qttuXyHMi7uIQv5QcrG 1454234190
Message-ID: <1454234188.12755.16.camel@robspanton.com>
Subject: [geda-user] Removing baked-in minimums
From: "Rob Spanton (rob AT robspanton DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 09:56:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.4 (3.18.4-1.fc23) 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

I found that I couldn't create a via, or pin, in pcb with a copper annulus
around it smaller than 0.0508mm.  Having a baked-in constant that prevents one
from doing this is not particularly useful.

I've registered this as a bug, and included a patch as an attachment to that
bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/1539882

Cheers,

Rob