X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net Subject: Re: [geda-user] The nature of gEDA layers To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20160126233332 DOT dec2f06f5c74354a3841989c AT gmail DOT com> <20160127091746 DOT 1c7a976c2752f913921688ac AT gmail DOT com> <20160127141334 DOT c738feb9dbeb54a7dec3dff8 AT gmail DOT com> <56A8F74B DOT 8080304 AT ecosensory DOT com> <56A961BC DOT 3040405 AT ecosensory DOT com> <56A9E416 DOT 8080500 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20160128200126 DOT 0fe1bb26d5c28e59d56dfd0e AT gmail DOT com> From: John Griessen Message-ID: <56AA95B5.8030805@ecosensory.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:27:01 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 01/28/2016 02:22 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> The aim should be to change PCB in small incremental steps. >> > >> >- Remove the assumption that all layers except "outline" are conductive. >> >- Make implicit layers explicit and allow to draw on them, soldermask, solderpaste. >> >- Allow more/all things inside Elements, on explicit layers. > This one in particular is not a small incremental step but a fairly > drastic change. A lot of work is likely to be required to fix all the > points that make assumptions about Elements. I'm not saying it's a > bad idea, but it's hard. > Yeah, but this kind of item is what makes life easier from then on. Some things are hard and deserve more than a quick patch fix, (More spaghetti code). On 01/28/2016 02:46 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Everyone seems to want these, to be honest I don't understand what > pads on middle layers are for. Not mounting components for sure. If > it's just a node what's wrong with a trace or poly? They give strength and increased conductivity by bigger connection cross section area. They serve as a large enough target for wandering drills to go through off center and still function well. That kind of connection tolerance is important for low frequency and essential for HF, RF to avoid reflections. John Griessen