X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Envelope-From: paubert AT iram DOT es Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 09:13:49 +0100 From: "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd (How ?) Message-ID: <20160128081349.GA12561@visitor2.iram.es> References: <56A751EC DOT 8030402 AT iae DOT nl> <20160126124701 DOT 0d061912c7e078ced9d4e6cb AT gmail DOT com> <201601261804 DOT u0QI4KEQ009550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160126192939 DOT 62f7f158250f536a0a6ab1ae AT gmail DOT com> <201601261836 DOT u0QIa8uQ010925 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spamina-Bogosity: Unsure X-Spamina-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spamina-Spam-Report: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: multi-circuit-boards.eu] 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4773] Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:57:41AM +0100, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: > > >> I do not consider buried/blind via a very high-end feature. > > > > None of the prototype offerings I use inclue b/b vias as options... > > My favorite fab offers blind and buried vias for all of their > products. ( http://basista.de ) > > > they're only included in much more expensive offerings. > > Basista charges 77.16 EUR with VAT and shipping included for a single > piece size 50mm x 100mm, 1.55 mm FR4, four layers, solder stop, > connection check, no silk. And they have outrageous charges for shipping outside Germany, over €45 for Spain for example (funny how they list Lesotho on their pull-down menus, I suspect they mean Latvia). > Minimum drill is 0.3 mm. Minimum size and > minimum distance is 0.15 mm. They do arbitrary contours. Would this be > a "much more expensive offering"? Right now I'm using multi-cb: http://www.multi-circuit-boards.eu/en/index.html The minimal drill size is 0.2mm, and standard (no surcharge) design rules are 125/125µ (5/5mil) for four layers HAL finish and 100/100µ (4/4mil) for 6+ layers (ENIG). Same example costs €59+S&H+VAT, but a second board is only €10 (+VAT) more. 6 layer board of same size is €98+VAT+S&H, (€116 for 2 boards) with 100/100µ rule, it's what I've used most in the last years. They also offer higher layer count but I have never used them, and I don't think I would use them without blind or buries vias: - 8 layer is €157 (€166 for Qty 2), never used. - 10 layer jumps to €519, but the second one is free! And even 10 will "only" be €546. Unfortunately they only sell to business. For private designs, I'm considering Eurocircuits. And no, I have no interest in them, I'm only a satisfied customer and we try to place several orders together here to minimize impact of S&H to Spain (<€30 in all cases). For now I've never done more than 6 layers and never really had a real need for blind or buried vias. I suspect that it would be different starting from 8 layers. Gabriel