X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7s/FDFCPMtUtqBuxo3ziIYIdIt7EqV75iNC8Ulzz3XI=; b=XftxHAzM/fJcraUb5NsWWkaC5PRHQcQeML3GAxCFWU3RM2Iu59lBa0c39Rn4XVErIK i7VJLnHZjNLszpUzh+7bwLuV/kgUhI/nVfeqA5Nh1Wq/VS8X+QzvxTGShgHTwvJ5VCVq Yi6oWKy593qdYGHgUTFZZJ056rF+nwnHXDlul3yGdH/bZg23owKiVxwSwKec4xy7b7a1 JwJ3kJ3exD88N+6pHo81FdIrC+mhx6dFIo4ll7WMG7U3Z6wd/Jw8ShXBNvWW8fThO9kI NJN5wvpyQThXSJISdz7858wO+XnofJHj17cPuxN6DnP/j1CzmzKcW7d8vbDDEOb4nVNt 9F6w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7s/FDFCPMtUtqBuxo3ziIYIdIt7EqV75iNC8Ulzz3XI=; b=T/WbeZVHVdLoqLybdwtJO/kkNXCPDHDZlPqCEJMBkfY9JvnqkumKyjQiwmXWvY+2/u dUBgqbIWxay5dI0lqi59Y1pFiztr6oJqBH/qfRPH4MfmvIKc8eKAcLz9PR5aKMCa5si4 lI0jGw4uvjlzj5vigWjQmo5Kzsya32w7C9Z4XK+L5enJtBMisp02Se4YVAGDa8xTl3G6 UoKFZ95FFhQiQ8CACWvaHeJkWvfEHd1NMsCIx9vZQATuKI6dMZqsBhwEgOt0C6JZT3EM q+XVJjVW+UwloMfMJ8l+vLi0lAuVBhcyH9OAe/ExLNqlgw9z/k2eItDKRxHqofpFj6XL CuvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSR0zroxOFw8GFNxDRro3Ty8NwX5BqikP38w9nrd4OlweOVyP6xo8Jib8A8HjuCTQ== X-Received: by 10.28.176.131 with SMTP id z125mr30633522wme.5.1453882671589; Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:17:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:17:46 +0100 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] The nature of gEDA users Message-Id: <20160127091746.1c7a976c2752f913921688ac@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <56A751EC DOT 8030402 AT iae DOT nl> <20160126124701 DOT 0d061912c7e078ced9d4e6cb AT gmail DOT com> <201601261804 DOT u0QI4KEQ009550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160126233332 DOT dec2f06f5c74354a3841989c AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > >> > But the first steps should not be "implement b/b vias" or "allow more > >> > than one pair of outer layers". It should be something like "express > >> > Elements and Vias as subclasses of generic containers that can include > >> > anything". > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > >> http://www.noqsi.com/ > >> jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > > I am probably on same track. A via or hole is: drilled cut out thru > > all layers with plating > > No. A via is a collection of circles, negative circles, thermals on > conductive layers, and a circle on a layer connecting the copper circles. > > The technology and DRC ruleset knows that the circles shall be drilled > at slightly larger diameter and filled with plating, and check the > copper circles accordingly. But that is several orders up in the > abstractions stack. > > -- > Stephan I got slightly wrong and would only add the circle connecting the copper circles really is a cut out or negative circle as you call it. I assume the following objects are equal and give the same result: drilled hole, negative object, cut out. To drill a hole thru only some of the layers I consider a little bit more involved. If I got objects wrong is less important. Do you think it would be good with possibility to draw on any layer inside element, pin, via, pad for those special cases that are a little bit different? Nicklas Karlsson