X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:48:45 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: "Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd
 (How ?)
In-Reply-To: <CANEvwqgs3YFnt7m8mA1DN6X2KdWbyr4zpXCVH321vDo1f7CyxA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1601261942330.9035@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601260416150 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv> <56A751EC DOT 8030402 AT iae DOT nl> <20160126124701 DOT 0d061912c7e078ced9d4e6cb AT gmail DOT com> <CANEvwqgs3YFnt7m8mA1DN6X2KdWbyr4zpXCVH321vDo1f7CyxA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Marvin Dickens (mpdickens AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>In this day and age to say blind/buried vias are not needed is
>ridiculous.The fact is ANY design that requires even one FPGA, custom ASIC
>or
>medium to large BGA needs blind/buried vias.
>
>This is factual and is easy vetted.

Facts:

- got 10 answers

- only 1 suggested that adding this feature in pcb-rnd would make him give 
pcb-rnd a serious try; 9 said they wouldn't use pcb-rnd or at 
least not because of blind/burried vias

My conclusion was that I don't need to add this feature in pcb-rnd 
because it wouldn't be used that much. I also said that the poll showed 
some more interest on mainlin pcb side but even there it's not a feature 
100% of answerers demanded.

What you answered to is none of what I stated. Please read the original 
mail again or even visit the link I posted.

Regards,

Igor2