X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 04:21:29 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] [pcb] poll: burried/blind vias vs. pcb and pcb-rnd
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1601180756390.9035@igor2priv>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1601260416150.9035@igor2priv>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1601180756390 DOT 9035 AT igor2priv>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi all,

thanks for everyone who has answered the poll. I also appreciate the 
effort of those who did not reply with off-topic stuff - the thread did 
not derail and was kept clean.

Results: http://repo.hu/projects/pcb-rnd/devlog/20162601.html

TL;DR: there's no strong demand for blind/burried vias on pcb-rnd side. 
This means I cancel my plans to support them. Mainline pcb may benefit 
from the feature but the demand there is not as high as I thought or as 
list traffic may have suggested lately.

Regards,

Igor2