X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net Subject: Re: [geda-user] Hierarchical design, pin number not needed To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20160125193136 DOT c1297d2b8e17f291e2250a4c AT gmail DOT com> <20160125204720 DOT 4B9C181053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <2EDA93DD-16DB-4A56-9B84-CFEADC5BCAFC AT noqsi DOT com> <201601252211 DOT u0PMBVQm031187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160125224733 DOT 82D2881053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> From: John Griessen Message-ID: <56A6BF58.5010704@ecosensory.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:35:36 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id u0Q0Zf8r018315 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 01/25/2016 05:00 PM, John Doty wrote: >> Perhaps "multipage” ? > No, that suggests a flat schematic on several pages. Hierarchy is a different concept. > multimodule is more like it. It may not be possible right away, but some day we want pages to no be holding any extra netlist info and each page is what is inside a symbol. Symbol module and page are then synonyms almost -- they correspond and can be translated losslessly between. Then you can have a top drawing and its symbols maybe have another drawing inside, or maybe they just have verilog code.