X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 (debian 1:2.8.0~rc1-2) with nmh-1.5 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: karl AT aspodata DOT se To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Hierarchical design, pin number not needed In-reply-to: References: <20160125193136 DOT c1297d2b8e17f291e2250a4c AT gmail DOT com> <20160125204720 DOT 4B9C181053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <2EDA93DD-16DB-4A56-9B84-CFEADC5BCAFC AT noqsi DOT com> <201601252211 DOT u0PMBVQm031187 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160125224733 DOT 82D2881053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to John Doty message dated "Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:00:06 -0700." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <20160125235401.C558D81053E4@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:54:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk John Doty: > On Jan 25, 2016, at 3:47 PM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: ... > > Perhaps "multipage” ? > No, that suggests a flat schematic on several pages. Hierarchy is > a different concept. I'm not an native enlish speaker, the word multipage implies for me just a bunch of pages, which content could be flatly or whatever arranged. And you are not required to do a hierarchical arrangement of the pages. The first (or top if you like) could be used without any schematics at all, just as an index, with all source syms with the same refdes. Then this use of subpages wouldn't be hier*cal at all. Mimicing some other abbrevations, what about h10l :) Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57