X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=DMAukFPyOu1Cnc6EdZsiJHaHhvwplYXfN3GsRJUhbQo=;
        b=n4NLIvLK54o8THES0XK79Kglp4o/gVEq155tFbjrTX9eI68SDPTX35MSrkODotaiCh
         Ke4pEsQRcWrKiG23yJR8LyMeDT5DVVASQ9UbKmamv48OT9I8NQ3GCTQ1njVysAuUdkBU
         Fy4sIBXhCYk77S2msisGnkoAtNpGL1iFLqaYP/3lLHyke7lm5ljB3g5P++XnrNihbVMq
         sa2kj/DaKTOGVXuLhYaSLCNG7pS8HzNKJw3GDRgsHXrzQ3xgN1dz+lyxOuHH/ouXaJs+
         neV2XXlCf9debIN/OoQzhpPV0HzoBOZb9uC7vIJZbsWfRV7A/s5Sng4eMJ4lvXmLBWHu
         YLlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=DMAukFPyOu1Cnc6EdZsiJHaHhvwplYXfN3GsRJUhbQo=;
        b=S0NPTYuWj2Z+AfIS0oVAJ8OAWr/8lC6zEKzBBn7AITasfA7c6HZCgR+mibg9c1FLpn
         OeL2+KVhYomrwvJkA+5jM59UZdcpPvnDrJt9MSsqyIIF3/IoLw2r7KqbrFaEWzL9kiiq
         hFH1Jlq/pYEojfz8Ejq0tSKYSWFtFrrKASqzl6pJboO7bSW0/650YckyWcxwrZRMY53/
         daq7BVGGZqLHWf3tbV637ZlJ/XW/Qb1SQS+KRjdnl0rHykHTZQOgMYbDYGOg4fZadpFk
         LYx9bWNFzkX+ACfNF52I+eZcmftO1s3qUCSiItbDQv0z6G60qU4LPl28tBrMs6xI79+r
         +7Ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTtwAYs8Kw+7YZ4EN+6PnQtazDjep3YLESBFeO3Pgp4XnjGOwCv1y2E9aGmZhM8UA==
X-Received: by 10.28.4.139 with SMTP id 133mr19656201wme.21.1453757945795;
        Mon, 25 Jan 2016 13:39:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:38:59 +0100
From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Hierarchical design, pin number not needed
Message-Id: <20160125223859.8f1120bf6f98c3ca60ee2b00@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9763429C-BEFE-443F-B4E7-EDB3BA4FF55D@noqsi.com>
References: <20160125193136 DOT c1297d2b8e17f291e2250a4c AT gmail DOT com>
	<9763429C-BEFE-443F-B4E7-EDB3BA4FF55D AT noqsi DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > Then using hierarchical design netlist complain if there are no pin numbers in symbol although in pcb it seems everything work OK without the pin numbers.
> 
> It doesn’t work OK if you’re not flattening hierarchy.

The number is in the symbol but not in the schematic underneath. How is the number used? Or what purpose does it fulfill?


Nicklas Karlsson